Search results

Interesting. You think there should be limits on free speech? Who sets the limits? p.s. Out of curiosity, where are you from? Iran? p.p.s. Your premise is wrong. One doesn't need to be sick in order to be a doctor. Likewise , one need not necessarily be able to speak Farsi, etc to know about...

...and today? See https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/01/yemen-bahai-sentenced-to-death-for-insulting-islam-and-apostasy and http://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/nation/2018/01/13/man-quran-defamation-facebook/

Moderated Muslims? What's that? To the extent Muslims reject the tenets of their faith they are apostates and you know what the punishment of apostasy is under sharia law? Death. Similarly, blasphemy (criticizing the prophet or the Koran or the faith) is a capital offense. Now, if a person born...

I don't know about the comparative levels of education between Arg and USA, but based upon your post # 6 above I suggest your brain power may also be similar to that of Homer. I offered this logical fallacy: "I hate A and B. A and B are letters ergo I hate all letters", to which you replied...

Islam is the most supremacist, intolerant of all religions with which I am familiar. I am not a big fan of homophobia. Homosexual acts are a capital offense in Islam often carried out by throwing violators off of roof tops. I am not a big fan of misogyny. Adultery by women is a capital offense...

I don't disagree that certain of types of skilled people may be given a preference in immigration law if that is your point, however the tailoring would be to skills, not to locations per se.

Can, and "endless" is limited by the US Constitution's prohibition of laws that are ill defined. Immigration law applies to immigration to the USA, not to a particular zone, state or other qualified unique area. I'm not sure what the reference to the carve out for Alaska is in the Trumpcare bill...

ben, I respectfully disagree. There is a limit to how fine fed law can be tailored. gracielle suggested there be a law tailored to each US state that may have a need for guest workers. That would require changes to the current law, the INA, which are simply unworkable.

To whom are you referring? Could you not have referenced (or quoted) the objectionable post?

Immigration law is the subject of federal legal jurisdiction. It is not susceptible to state by state tailoring.

Can I get an executive summary? What is your point? (re immigration)

I am surprised to learn your husband was unable to find any legal employees. I presume he was offering competitive wages, if not, the promise of union wages. Yes? If so, PM me. I 'm pretty sure I can refer him some legal workers from the SF bay area.

You really don't see a geographical difference between a guest worker program for citizens of Mexico vs citizens of Haiti or African nations? Are you willing to pay the passage?

Were these policies about which you complain enacted during Trump's administration or prior ones? Are you referring to immigrants from a particular country? If so, which?

No, I didn't know that no "unvetted" Muslims or others were "ever" allowed into the US for immigration or visiting purposes, but it does surprise me. Do you really mean to say "ever?" Ellis Island, included? If so, how do you define vetting? If you say it takes a year to get "vetted for...

I'm not sure what your point is. Are you suggesting that a Bracero-like guest worker program ought to be incorporated into any new immigrant related legislation? I'm pretty sure that would not be geographically feasible for Haitians or people from African nations. If it were, I might be...

Oh, I see. You are “ a very stable genius” who is “like, really smart.” Gee whiz, that reminds me of someone who just expressed a similar thought.

Maslow's law: When the only tool you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

To better understand the above link, I translated it on Google. The piece that you have linked as proof of your assertion that Macri said he wants to make Argentinians poorer says no such thing and ,in fact, has an opposite meaning. You have lost credibility. I no longer feel the need to argue...

I can not respond to each and every point in your argument. I'm all in favor of a just society - as you seem to be - with a fairer distribution of wealth. However, you come across as anti-Macri ideologue and some of what you wrote does shock and or confuse me. For example, did Macri really state...