A year into Milei’s presidency, poverty hits a new high

I sarched for the "poverty line" in Argentina and immediately found this article:


"Argentina's poverty line is defined as a monthly income that is less than the amount required to purchase a basic basket of consumer goods. The poverty line is:
Adult: Less than US\$292 per month
Family of two children: Less than US\$904 per month

An adult making less than US\$132 per month is considered to be in extreme poverty.
Argentina's poverty rate has been increasing in recent months:

In the first half of 2023, 52.9% of Argentines were below the poverty line. This is the highest level since the 2001 financial crisis.
In the second half of 2023, the poverty rate dropped to 41.7%.

In the first six months of President Javier Milei's term, the extreme poverty rate increased from 11.9% to 18.1%."

The figures in the article may not accurately apply now. My closest neighbors are a family with two children and the combined income of parents is nowhere near US\$900 per month. Fortunately, they don't pay rent. Emmanuel recently told me it costs $20,000 pesos per day to feed his family. They are paying five times more for electricity and nafta sine early 2024, and over ten times more for a 10kg garrafa of LP gas.

Meanwhile, since January, his monthly salary as a police officer at the naval base has only increased from $300.000 to $500.000 (mas o menos). His pareja works as well, but earns much less. They also make crafts to sell in the plaza and/or at the beach in Punta Alta.
 

Yet the government published this two days ago.

Link to study cited:

…without social assistance from policies such as the Universal Child Allowance (AUH) or the Food Card, the situation would be much worse: the indigence rate of 12.3% would have been 23.2% and poverty, instead of 49.9%, would be 55.4%.

The linked study admits that the only reason their calculations “lower” the poverty rate is because of the subsidies the government is providing, instead of improvements to the economy which might increase people’s ability to provide for themselves.

Most countries do not use non-cash food subsidies in the calculation of the poverty rate. not normal for this study to have included.
 
The linked study admits that the only reason their calculations “lower” the poverty rate is because of the subsidies the government is providing, instead of improvements to the economy which might increase people’s ability to provide for themselves.

Most countries do not use non-cash food subsidies in the calculation of the poverty rate. not normal for this study to have included.
Was this the same methodology used to count poverty in 2023 and before in Argentina?
 
Was this the same methodology used to count poverty in 2023 and before in Argentina?
No. This is an outside study that the current regime has highlighted to counter the regular statistics by the governments own INDEC national statistics bureau. That standard recently reported the half-year 52.9% percent poverty rate. The same we have all seen posted here often, and in reported local and international news over last month.
 
Do I have this straight? When a goverment of a different political colour manipulated the INDEC statistics and created "alternative facts" with an "IPC Congreso", there was hell to pay, nationally and internationally, with adverse judgements handed down all over the place.

But when the "forces of heaven" publish their alternative facts on the official goverment website, that's no problem? :rolleyes:

That's not to say the study is unserious, but consistency of methodology is essential for measuring this, or any government's performance.
 
Back
Top