Here are the views form other economists about the Agreements with China, from Infobae
http://www.infobae.c...-firmados-china
Google translation
I would divide this between trade, infrastructure and financial agreements. The financial arrangement is an absolute fantasy, like the one signed (Martin) Redrado in 2010, where it is wrongly assumed that there is a contribution to strengthen central bank reserves, with yuans.. All that matters are dollars, "said Carlos Melconian, the PRO.
Former Central Bank president Aldo Pignanelli,, also played down the Chinese currency swap. "The Yuan is a currency that has no international integration. They can not even be counted as reserves," he analyzed.
" Dollars will not be going to enter into Argentina, but products that we will have to pay," insisted Pignanelli. Just recognized that yuan swaps could only serve to "import more things from China, nothing more."
Something similar evaluated the former head of the Central Bank,, Martin Redrado, who felt that a swap with China is good for trade, but neutral for reserves.
Melconian also downplayed the investments he announced. "If the bids for dams have been correct , the Chinese, what they have to contribute, more than generosity, are machines, to sell".