steveinbsas
Registered
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2006
- Messages
- 11,063
- Likes
- 7,438
I just asked Google AI about the status of the decreto and migraciones power to determine the rules for tourists and temporary and permanent residents and recieved this reply:
"Argentina's National Directorate of Migration (DNM) has seen an aggressive expansion of its administrative powers, granting it unprecedented authority to police borders, deny entry, and bypass traditional judicial checks. Even with federal appeals courts declaring parts of the citizenship decree unconstitutional, the DNM retains massive day-to-day power over residency and drecieved eportations.
The Split: Courts vs. Immigration PowersUnder the Javier Milei administration's Decree of Necessity and Urgency (DNU) 366/2025, the government attempted to strip federal courts of naturalization jurisdiction and hand it to the DNM.The National Electoral Chamber recently struck down that specific shift. The court ruled that citizenship directly influences voting rights, meaning changes must go through Congress, not executive decrees.However, this court ruling only targets citizenship and voting rights. It does not strip the DNM of its newly expanded police and administrative powers over tourist entries, temporary residencies, or deportations.
The DNM’s Power TodayOutside of citizenship, the DNM functions with significantly heightened enforcement capabilities:Expedited Deportations: The DNM now operates with a dedicated enforcement arm (often compared to a localized version of U.S. ICE). The DNU halved the procedural timeframes for deportations, allowing the DNM to quickly remove foreigners who commit crimes or violate status, severely limiting traditional access to a lengthy judicial appeal.Subjective Entry Denials ("False Tourists"): Border agents have expanded authority to interrogate arrivals.
If the DNM believes a foreigner's real intent is to work or live in Argentina rather than vacation, they can deny entry on the spot for "misrepresenting reasons of entry".Economic and Insurance Hurdles: The DNM legally enforces strict entry checkpoints. Tourists must sign affidavits regarding their travel purpose and present proof of contracted medical insurance to clear border agents. To transition into permanent residency, applicants must now robustly satisfy the DNM's strict economic means testing.
Strict Residency Tracking: Under the DNM’s digital RADEX system, physical presence is closely logged. For those on the residency path, leaving the country for extended periods without prior DNM authorization can
result in the immediate resetting or cancellation of status clocks."
If this is accurate, then it is likely that the new rules regarding granting only temporary residency for three years rather than immediately granting permanent residency based on marriage to an Argentine citizen and requiring permanent residents to set foot on Argentine soil at least once a year
If the Suprema Court upholds the ruling and negates migraciones' power to grant citizenship, I wonder if the courts will resume granting "immediate" citizenship (a process that will still take a year or so) based on marriage, while migraciones will still have the power to maintain the new timeline for permanent residency at three years, just like past and present foreigners with temporary residency based on foreign income.
"Argentina's National Directorate of Migration (DNM) has seen an aggressive expansion of its administrative powers, granting it unprecedented authority to police borders, deny entry, and bypass traditional judicial checks. Even with federal appeals courts declaring parts of the citizenship decree unconstitutional, the DNM retains massive day-to-day power over residency and drecieved eportations.
The Split: Courts vs. Immigration PowersUnder the Javier Milei administration's Decree of Necessity and Urgency (DNU) 366/2025, the government attempted to strip federal courts of naturalization jurisdiction and hand it to the DNM.The National Electoral Chamber recently struck down that specific shift. The court ruled that citizenship directly influences voting rights, meaning changes must go through Congress, not executive decrees.However, this court ruling only targets citizenship and voting rights. It does not strip the DNM of its newly expanded police and administrative powers over tourist entries, temporary residencies, or deportations.
The DNM’s Power TodayOutside of citizenship, the DNM functions with significantly heightened enforcement capabilities:Expedited Deportations: The DNM now operates with a dedicated enforcement arm (often compared to a localized version of U.S. ICE). The DNU halved the procedural timeframes for deportations, allowing the DNM to quickly remove foreigners who commit crimes or violate status, severely limiting traditional access to a lengthy judicial appeal.Subjective Entry Denials ("False Tourists"): Border agents have expanded authority to interrogate arrivals.
If the DNM believes a foreigner's real intent is to work or live in Argentina rather than vacation, they can deny entry on the spot for "misrepresenting reasons of entry".Economic and Insurance Hurdles: The DNM legally enforces strict entry checkpoints. Tourists must sign affidavits regarding their travel purpose and present proof of contracted medical insurance to clear border agents. To transition into permanent residency, applicants must now robustly satisfy the DNM's strict economic means testing.
Strict Residency Tracking: Under the DNM’s digital RADEX system, physical presence is closely logged. For those on the residency path, leaving the country for extended periods without prior DNM authorization can
result in the immediate resetting or cancellation of status clocks."
If this is accurate, then it is likely that the new rules regarding granting only temporary residency for three years rather than immediately granting permanent residency based on marriage to an Argentine citizen and requiring permanent residents to set foot on Argentine soil at least once a year
If the Suprema Court upholds the ruling and negates migraciones' power to grant citizenship, I wonder if the courts will resume granting "immediate" citizenship (a process that will still take a year or so) based on marriage, while migraciones will still have the power to maintain the new timeline for permanent residency at three years, just like past and present foreigners with temporary residency based on foreign income.
