Excluding street names, why are there many more place names in Argentina with the name of Colón (after Christopher Columbus) than Gaboto (after Sebastian Cabot)* or Magallanes (after Ferdinand Magellan)**, even though both Cabot and Magellan (but not Columbus) explored various parts of present-day Argentine territory in the Age of Discovery? Does it have to do with the pan-Hispanic symbolism of Columbus throughout Latin America as well as Spain? In the case of Magellan, is it because he spent much more time in Patagonia and Tierra del Fuego than in the Rio de la Plata area?
*The only Gaboto I could think of in Argentina is [Puerto] Gaboto in Santa Fé province.
**There are plenty of place names and other things in far southern Chile, though, named Magallanes.
Also, why does only Uruguay (but not also Argentina) have places and sites (again, excluding street names) named after Juan Díaz de Solís - because Solís, during his expedition, landed on the Uruguayan side of the Rio de la Plata but not on the Argentine side?
Moreover, yet again not including street names, why are there hardly any place names or sites in Buenos Aires (city or province) named after Pedro de Mendoza, the founder of the first iteration of Buenos Aires in 1536 - because his Buenos Aires failed against Indian attacks?
*The only Gaboto I could think of in Argentina is [Puerto] Gaboto in Santa Fé province.
**There are plenty of place names and other things in far southern Chile, though, named Magallanes.
Also, why does only Uruguay (but not also Argentina) have places and sites (again, excluding street names) named after Juan Díaz de Solís - because Solís, during his expedition, landed on the Uruguayan side of the Rio de la Plata but not on the Argentine side?
Moreover, yet again not including street names, why are there hardly any place names or sites in Buenos Aires (city or province) named after Pedro de Mendoza, the founder of the first iteration of Buenos Aires in 1536 - because his Buenos Aires failed against Indian attacks?