Golpe de estado in Paraguay

PhilinBSAS said:
If the "impeachment" was illegal i.e didn't follow appropriate/designated constitutional process why has the (ex) President not challenged it and sat tight?

Acquiescent very quickly - Seems he was rather relieved to get out? Live to fight another day? lost all his friends?

Some sort of deal in the background which we won't hear about immediately?

I don't know anything I'm just suspicious there is more than what has come out so far.

Point taken about the elite and their penchant for overtly wielding power

Seems Evo Morales in Bolivia has kept his bum more firmly in the chair - stayed more in touch with his constituency

Well - I saw on the news yesterday while grabbing a bite in Jumbo that the removal was challenged and the Paraguayan supreme court refused to hear it. I can't believe that the supreme court, which has been assigned by Colorado party members (as it has been they who have been in power for 65 years with a 4 year hiatus in the presidency alone) would turn their backs on their democratic institutions :rolleyes:

I seem to have mentioned many times that there were indeed many backroom deals made, although I didn't call it that specifically. What I have said was more like corruption and dictatorship. My lawyer, in his comments I posted made the same comment.

I also, on my lawyer's comments, was reminded of the probable reason for the impeachment and removal to begin with - Lugo's veto of a bill to give $50M USD to the political parties so they can begin buying votes for the April 2013 election. When that bill was announced, the people themselves were demonstrating against it, and Lugo vetoed it.

Dude, I'm sorry to say this, but your comments here indicate you really have no idea what's going on in Paraguay, particularly when you compare Lugo's situation to Morales in Bolivia staying in touch with his constituency. In Lugo's situation - I didn't realize his constituency were the senators and congressmen who ousted him. I really thought his constituency were the people of Paraguay themselves, who elected him and were at the point of causing some serious problems for the government until they backed down because, as my lawyer said, the Paraguayan people are pretty peaceful overall. I can assure you the great majority of Lugo's constituents were not pleased with what happened to him.

And my point wasn't simply that the elite wield power overtly there - the Colorado party have a tight grasp on Paraguay and obviously rule as dictators, bypassing all of the time the constitution. They buy votes, they buy elected offices from candidates outside of their party who win, they intimidate people, and never a problem with the courts and such. Why? Because it's all owned by Colorado.

And you have a suspicion that something else is behind his removal? Like what?

The congressmen who ousted him say that he was somehow involved in a land dispute where rich people who were given land back in the 80s by a dictator were trying to oust the poor people who claim that the land was theirs back then and they wanted it back. People died and were injured. Lugo says he is going to open an investigation, but before he can even do that, he's impeached and then removed from office. Many in Paraguay think the Colorado party was behind this to begin with, instigating the problem and then taking advantage of a pretense to remove him from office, because they certainly couldn't just come out and say "we want our $50M USD and we're going to remove you if you don't give it to us."

And if Lugo was somehow behind the land dispute, as the impeachment claimed, why wasn't he given time to defend himself? This certainly wasn't the first land dispute to have happened during Lugo's term.

Maybe it was his one officially acknowledged son born out of wedlock that was behind the desire to oust him? Or the 8 others who came out of the woodwork and said he fathered their kids as well? Colorado tried to besmirch his name with that long ago but were rebuffed by the people who said "what the hell do we care if a man has masculine appetites as long as he's honest and thinks about more than the rich and powerful in our country?"

Is he tired? Absolutely. But that isn't the reason he gave up the office. He's an ex-Catholic bishop, supposedly a man of peace, and he saw the only thing that his trying to stay in power would do is cause more problems in the country - and no matter what he did, he would not be able to retain the presidency in front of the obvious kangaroo court that was called.

He fought every day of his presidency against the idiots in power there. He had cancer and went through treatments in Brasil (while Colorado party members were saying publicly that they hoped he succumbed to the disease). Of course he's tired. But yet, he still is attending MERCORSUR and UNASUR meetings as the head of state of Paraguay because those institutions don't recognize the new president as valid. If it was just that he was tired, I don't think he'd be doing any of that.

And I want to see what he's really trying to do there as well, in MERCOSUR and UNASUR. It would be nice if he's trying to mitigate the damage the Paraguayan congress did to the country internationally. We are going there in July to help my wife's family plan on how to improve their (currently) subsistence farming with some irrigation systems. That won't do us any good if no one regionally wants to buy things like strawberries, onions, bell peppers, tomatoes, etc - no markets in which to sell them. So maybe the poor get screwed again, because those in power can weather something like that with no problem, until the next elections.

There was nothing democratic in what happened in Paraguay. You can split hairs and try to down-play what happened, but that's pretty typical of South American government here when it comes to their own internal politics anyway - it doesn't make it right and certainly doesn't make it democratic.

And as far as having friends - Franco, the ex-vice president who is now president, gave Lugo fits and starts the whole time. Most of Lugo's supposed friends pretty much fled from him after he was elected, after being pressured by Colorado elements.

He had no friends at all, except the people, who were proven to be irrelevant by their own government.
 
I think the main problem is that the vast majority of people, who comment on these threads, don't really have a grasp on South Americas political history so it's hard for them to comprehend current events within the proper context. Coups are the way of life here in Latin America. " Constitutional coups " are just the new flavor. Support them all you want, just don't wrap them in a cloak of democracy because then all you are doing is cheapening the word.


Many of these " constitutions " where created during dictatorships, military or otherwise. Just because Paraguay is now a democratic nation that doesn't mean it's constitution is democratic as well. Like in this case, a 5 hour impeachment trial after a 24 hour notice to depose a democratically elected president of the people ( on ludicrous charges ) is not democracy by any stretch of the imagination.

These kinds of loop holes where put in place by these very same dictatorships in order to reign in any presidents that they think overstep their bounds. And by overstep their bounds I mean introducing reform to nations that are in desperate need of it. That is why the first thing that leftist leaders did when they got into power was immediately try and call for Constitutional Referendums. Oh how the right cried foul. Their loops holes were being taken away from them. :p

And to answer Philips questions regarding why Lugo initially left without making much noise. If you would have simply read his statement you would have seen that his first priority was to avoid bloodshed. And even if he would have tried to stay, just look at Zelaya. After they " constitutionally impeached " him and he refused to leave, the military came in " persuaded " him to leave peacefully and by persuade I mean they stormed into his home and threatened to kill him and his family if he didn't immediately get on a plane. Honduras, another beacon of Democracy with a " democratic constitution ". :rolleyes:

But hey, ignorance is bliss.

And btw, Queso, next time I owe you some money i'm paying you via international wire transfer to your account in Argentina. :)
 
ElQueso said:
Dude, I'm sorry to say this, but your comments here indicate you really have no idea what's going on in Paraguay,

Dude I was asking questions (wasnt there enough question marks spread around in what I wrote) so no need for apologising I make no pretence at all to knowing what is going on in Paraguay. You obviously do speak with authority so thanks for the knowledge and insight. Given what you have said about having close connections with Paraguay then some sensitivity and apprehension is understandable

The "President's constituency" reference I made was intended to mean the same as yours i.e electorate rather than the Congress factions

Yes the simple answers would indeed seem to be that the ex-president wants to avoid inevitable bloodshed both his and those who are close to him and the supreme constitutional court is either powerless or rigged or both.

Other latin american states seem to be lining up on his side but North America and Western Europe are less emphatic.
 
PhilinBSAS said:
Dude I was asking questions (wasnt there enough question marks spread around in what I wrote)

Sorry dude - I misunderstood.

PhilinBSAS said:
Other latin american states seem to be lining up on his side but North America and Western Europe are less emphatic.

I think the big reason for that is because the US and EU have so often supported the wrong people, often for the wrong reasons, throughout a lot of semi-recent history. As well, they seem to be saying, this time - work out your own affairs and we'll accept the result.

If the politicians in the US would always side on what they thought was right as opposed to what they thought would get them a further toe-hold in a given region, they probably wouldn't have that problem to begin with.

In this particular case, I am so mixed. I don't want the government in Paraguay to get any official recognition, but at the same time I don't want to see the poor people get hurt even further by things that aren't going to make any difference anyway.

The idiots who run Paraguay will do what they will and until the people there rise up (mentally and/or physically) and do something about the remains of dictatorship there nothing will change. In the meantime, the poor need trade to continue in order to survive.
 
That is because they are the ones backing the rightist elements in the country. Pretty much Honduras Redux as far as the US's initial stance. I just love it when the US's allies do something wrong, the US always says " everybody remain calm and chill out " but when an " enemy " does something even remotely wrong it's all " the United Nation and NATO will not stand for this, lets press for sanctions and UN resolutions asap ".

lol. So transparent.

PhilinBSAS said:
but North America and Western Europe are less emphatic.
 
Back
Top