artigas
Registered
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2012
- Messages
- 65
- Likes
- 126
I think you are confusing the concept of supply and demand. CNBA was established to identify the best young intellects in Argentina and to educate them for the next generation of government and civic leaders. For the past 30-50 years, Argentine society and voters have demanded Peronist/ Marxist political leaders and CNBA has supplied that demand, as it was intended to do. I would argue that its better to have the relatively well educated Marxists you mentioned rather than the self taught, authoritarian and corrupt Marxist bus drivers, junior military officers or shop floor trade unionists found in other Latin American countries. I can tell you from my own experience, there is a wide and healthy variety of political pluralism at CNBA, there simply has not been a significant societal demand in Argentina for non-Peronist/ Marxist politicians until recently. Ambitious non-Peronist/ Marxist students simply have gone on to pursue success in non-political fields such as medicine, law, business and the arts. It is very Marxist logic to believe that by simply increasing the production of more Marxists at an elite school you can artificially create a demand for more Marxism in the wider society.At one time CNBA was in fact the premier secondary school in Argentina; illustrious figures such as Carlos Pelligrini, Marcelo T de Alvear, Manuel Belgrano and Bernardo Rivadavia were educated there; all the Nobel Laureates, Presidents, etc all attended CNBA more than a century ago . Unfortunately in the last 30-50 years or so the Colegio Nacional de Buenos Aires has produced Marxists such as Mario Firmenich, Axel Kiciloff, Mariano Recalde and Andres Larroque.