pericles said:Regarding Chinese swapping dollars for real assets this is already happening big time in Argentina and some very important land acquisitions are on the cards now.
BlahBlah said:I just made the point there is no inflation now, that's correct.
There is no need to be concerned about inflation now
Recoleta Carolina said:WOW! You think that there is no inflation now? Maybe the issue of inflation has to do with what one is willing to pay for or what one has to pay for.
If you are paying for health insurance your premiums are going up enormously each year. Anyone with health issues knows that there is serious inflation. If you have kids in private school or college you know that there is serious inflation. The cost of groceries is not what it used to be. The cost of gasoline is way up there again in the States. People are being careful of how often they drive again. When I first came to Buenos Aires the taxi meter started at around $1.20. It now begins at $3.80. That is inflation to me. A very fine dinner 5 years ago cost about 30% of what it would today in Buenos Aires. The cost of airline tickets has gone sky high in those same years.
I would be curious as to what exactly you think constitutes inflation?
mini said:I think BlahBlah was talking about inflation in the US & not in Argentina.
Recoleta Carolina said:Inflation is very high in the States. All forms of insurance, treatment for anything health related, gasoline, food, education, etc. Why do you think that so many Americans are living paycheck to paycheck?
Recoleta Carolina said:Inflation is very high in the States. All forms of insurance, treatment for anything health related, gasoline, food, education, etc. Why do you think that so many Americans are living paycheck to paycheck?
mini said:Do you know what the inflation rate is in the US? Do you think that the official rate is not the real rate, like what happens here in Argentina?
The article does go on to explain that while this system of variable-goods was not used, it was mimicked by giving lower weightings to good rapidly rising in price. Cumulatively, annual inflation is underreported by about 7%. Thus if 2% is the official rate, a more accurate estimate would be 9%. So if an American received a pay rise of 3% (in the good days, not today) and the official rate was 2%, then by golly, he should be more prosperous than ever. And yet his or her budget was more strained than ever. And then rent-a-pundits would appear on television decrying the McMansions and SUVs, blaming the culture of consumption rather than the true culprit: higher cost of living.The Boskin/Greenspan argument was that when steak got too expensive, the consumer would substitute hamburger for the steak, and that the inflation measure should reflect the costs tied to buying hamburger versus steak, instead of steak versus steak. Of course, replacing hamburger for steak in the calculations would reduce the inflation rate, but it represented the rate of inflation in terms of maintaining a declining standard of living. Cost of living was being replaced by the cost of survival. The old system told you how much you had to increase your income in order to keep buying steak. The new system promised you hamburger, and then dog food, perhaps, after that.