bigbadwolf said:
Steve, I mostly agree with what you've written but want to point out the US is in a depression now. "Recession" has become a euphemism.
The greatest distinction between a recession and a depression is that using the word depression "justifies" the actions of congress, borrowing and spending trillions of dollars, claiming
that will prevent a deeper depression than the one we "already" have, creating
or saving three million jobs....even though they don't really care about
any of that...in the first place.
They already know the "recovery act" will probably make matters worse, giving them the chance to seize more power and assume even greater control over the actions of private business and lives of individual citizens, introducing even more drastic measures to correct the "evils" of the free market or so called "disaster" capitalism.
I seriously doubt the Democrats are finished, no matter which way the economy goes from here. There is a never ending supply of social/government programs that they sincerely believe in and want to implement, whether they work or not and whether or not the funds exist to pay for them. Most of them don't even know what they're voting on in the current economic "recovery" act (aka stimulus package).
It's in their blood. Its what they
have to do. When GWB was still the president, Nancy Pelosi spoke of the "opportunity cost" of the war in Iraq. Now she and her cronies are going to spend far more to do what's right for the
people. (After all,
they know what's good for us, even if we don't.)
This is truly wonderful if you believe that the primary purpose of government is "helping" those in need. But the more that government is "willing" to help, the greater will be the "needs" of the people (too many suckling piglets).
Just listen to
the people begging President Obama for kitchens, bathrooms, and unemployment benefits equal to their former wages (among other needs) at town hall meetings.
That's the future of America...a nation of
beggars...hoping the government will "take care" of them, or, as in the case of those greedy and (unfortunately) apologetic corporate executives,
allow them to exist (with "appropriate" restrictions on salaries, bonuses, and perks, of course).
Are the "people" going to revolt when the government is unable to meet their needs and the private business sector (as a result of increasing and crippling government regulations and taxes) "fails" them as well?
If so, I wonder what kind of political and economic system will prevail in the aftermath.
I hope it's one where the government does what is best for everyone:
Just leave them alone.
Not likely, is it?