Tyson is not a practicing scientist, just a popularizer, and like many defenders of GMO, he is very misleading. There is a big difference between traditional cross-breeding techniques and what goes on in Mosanto (a chemical company) labs that produce GMO crops. He is also wrong about supposed "fear at all new technologies," an assertion for which he presents no evidence. Almost no one fears laptops or the internet for example.
His argument in general is disingenuous, as anyone who has lived in and outside the USA knows. In the USA all the "sweet, juicy" crops he talks about are actually plastic and tasteless, and I'd also call the pork and beef you can generally get in the US also tasteless. Someone who has tasted traditionally grown organic foods in Argentina or Europe knows the difference by taste alone. In the USA it's very difficult to find, for example, onions or tomatoes with a strong onion or tomato flavor even at Whole Foods (you have to go to small organic farmers' markets). It's next to impossible to taste genuine pork in the USA. So his argument about taste is baseless. The distinction isn't between "wild" varieties and GMO's but between traditionally grown crops on one hand, and industrially-grown crops on the other, of which GMO are the latest and most dangerous variety.
Be sure that all these advocates of GMO crops don't eat them themselves, but buy organic for their families.