Views here veer from saying nothing will change whatever politicians want or so, and saying that a CFK victory would bring the worst of all possible worlds. I can see the Macri method as the ancient liberal programme of cutting imports, creating trade surpluses, passing on prices to domestic cosumers wherever possible and widening profit margins by sweating labour rather than major investment. CFK could at best ameliorate the deep impoverishment of the bottom 30% but has few alternatives beyond trying to boost domestic growth by infrastructure etc investment. It was not the Kircheners but a traditionalist who defaulted on IMF debts last time and the Kircherners oversaw one of the more impressive recoveries in years during 2002/07 esp in regard to reducing deep inequalities. So I am unclear why people assume CFK would be the worst possible outcome even if international speculation drives the peso to 80 against the USD and that is as yet unproven guess?