So, you don't think the government should deprive Dylann Roof of his liberty for having exercised his Second Amendment rights.
I find it interesting that you consider mass murder "exercis[ing] his Second Amendment rights". You are full of hyperbole, among other things.
Edit: I wish I'd thought of this first: No, I don't think the government should deprive Dylann Roof of his liberty for having exercised his Second Amendment rights. What kind of a government would give rights and then arrest the people for exercising them?
I do think it's a shame that no one in the church had a weapon with which to defend themselves against a fanatical/crazed idiot who committed unwarranted aggression against others, taking 9 lives.
Meanwhile, I wonder where libertarian politicians get their funding? http://tinyurl.com/pwrs2vd
Also interesting that you equate some racist idiots who also happen to be Republican with Republicans who are tired of the stupidity of the Republican party and contribute to Libertarians who are running under Republican party tickets to change the party to what they used to claim they believe in, to mass murders. Goebbels would be proud of you!