TheDonald
Registered
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2018
- Messages
- 210
- Likes
- 303
I get all that.
What I don´t get is increasing wages at the same time simultaneously.
It offsets the purpose of printing in the first place.
2 competing factors are being pushed both in the same direction.
Would it make more sense if they were pushed in opposite directions?
Or, at least fix one factor and push the other factor in the direction you want.
You are right: prices and wages do move in the same direction. And you are also right that to a great degree, they cancel each other out. But the source of inflation and the victims of inflation are distinct groups; the former is not responsible for how the latter deals with inflation.
In Argentina, the main source of inflation has historically been socialist politicians. They print money to buy votes. They do this by spending money the government doesn't have. They either print money with a press (Cristina) or borrow it abroad (Macri). An increase in the money supply makes each unit of money worth less, so it causes inflation.
When a government spends beyond its means by printing money, it starts a chain reaction. There are more pesos out there, so each peso is worth less. Banks are closest to the gears of government, so they act first. They raise interest rates. Now YPF needs more pesos to pay interest to the bank and to buy a barrel of oil, so they raise the price of gas. Now truckers need more pesos to buy gas to deliver flour, so they raise the price of delivery. Now bakeries need more pesos to buy flour to make bread, so they raise price of bread. Now the worker needs more pesos to buy bread, so he demands a raise from his/her employer. Now the employer has to pay higher wages so they raise prices on whatever they sell. On and on it goes. It ripples destructively all through the economy.