Search results

Deportation and fines of course. They are like 6.000.000 pesos.

The best option today is to apply for citizenship under the former law requesting the unconstitutionality of DNU 366/2025.

She can ignore the deportation order and then apply for citizenship. She can also appeal at CAF Courts for years if her lawyer is smart and stays under the regime before DNU.

Yes, she can apply for citizenship. But she has to do it under Federal Courts alleging the DNU 366/2025 is unconstitutional because art. 75 inc. 12 of the NC bans the President on citizenship plus uninterrupted residency is what we used to call serfdom.

DNU 366/2025 lower everyone's status. Citizens now are permanent residents, and PM like your friend now are temporary residents. This is why DNU says citizenship (a second class one) now is under DNM competency, but they can only grant Permanent Residency.

If you follow that path, you cannot travel at all. However, you can apply under the former Law with passport.

This is not accurate. The the majority doctrine at Federal Courts during DNU 70/2017 was it does not exist because the Comisión Bicameral didn’t approved it (170 cases) against it is unconstitutional (120 cases) and it is constitutional (2 cases).

DNU 366/2025 says now you apply at DNM, but it is possible to challenge it like it was the DNU 70/2017.

Cases of citizenship at Federal Courts were already accepted after DNU 366/2025:

The DNV is the worst possible option.

Well, this was always obvious. How do you thinK they waste all the loans with the IMF? This is the story of the Argentine external debt: 1976/82 about 70 billion, 1990/2011 another 90 billion, 2017/21 another 70 billion and the same since Milei got into power. It was always used to intervening...

I believe Macri wants so. He is the one behind CFK SC decision.

No. They want to scan hard copies.

Federal judges can ignore decrees and declare them unconstitutional.

This negotiation you mention is in the room with you, does it speak with you? In public law there is no negotiation at all, administrativa immigration courts are marcial court of a POW system developed at DNU 366/2025.

Lawyers’s fees to challenge a DNU are never cheaper Art. 45 DNU says they continue under former law under Federal Judges.

In fact the only thing that ruled is now you need a lawyer to apply under the Constitutional requirements at Federal Courts.

Art. 45 says it has no retroactive effect.

DNU 366 abolished Federal Citizenship. Now natives are permanent residents. It also abolished permanente residency for foreigners, now they are all precarious.