Dublin2BuenosAires
Registered
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2012
- Messages
- 2,510
- Likes
- 3,104
It is literally impossible to argue with vague statements like "there are a number of scientists who..." and the whole desparate clinging to Drew is rather bizarre, I mean he is one person entirely entitled to his opinions.
You are very attached to the big bang despite me mentioning that it was only one of a number of complementary theories. The difference between all of these concurrent theories and the optimistically named Intelligent Design is that they rely on physics and mathematics rather than religious philosophy. If you are comfortable with that, that is your choice and you are welcome to it. I believe it has no basis in the science classroom.
Post positivist, possibly, if that makes you feel more comfortable with the awkward pigeon holes which the philosophy of science insists upon. Certainly a pragmatist, and definitely a rejectionist in terms of the dogmatic nonsense represented by Intelligent Design.
Good luck & goodbye.
You are very attached to the big bang despite me mentioning that it was only one of a number of complementary theories. The difference between all of these concurrent theories and the optimistically named Intelligent Design is that they rely on physics and mathematics rather than religious philosophy. If you are comfortable with that, that is your choice and you are welcome to it. I believe it has no basis in the science classroom.
Post positivist, possibly, if that makes you feel more comfortable with the awkward pigeon holes which the philosophy of science insists upon. Certainly a pragmatist, and definitely a rejectionist in terms of the dogmatic nonsense represented by Intelligent Design.
Good luck & goodbye.