John.St
Registered
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2009
- Messages
- 1,929
- Likes
- 1,021
I can, of course, only speak for myself, and as previously stated I see the development of the country depending on the one third of the Argentinos, who hold a wider perspective and acknowledge that although a not quite small part of the country's problems stem from the outside, there are only the Argentinos themselves to remedy the deficiencies. They are here, I think they are going to win in the end, but it may be somewhat into the future.theargie said:I just hope you don't think all of us argentines agree with Brigadier's statements. However he somehow reflects one of the main reasons why Argentina, even though it has lots of resources available, still remains a 3rd world country. It seems to be a cultural issue around here to blame others instead of thinking about what we did wrong to end up where we are, plan a solution, implement it and improve it. But no... it is extremely usual down here to see parents go to the schools with complains to the principal blaming the teacher for the "F" grade their son got on the test. So according to them, it wasnt the kid's fault for not studying, it was the teacher who did not teach him properly. And then the teacher could also blame the government for not paying him a decent salary, stating that as the reason why he goes to class demotivated. And its all a game of blaming others... the illegal bolivianos that use our public hospitals, the "cartoneros", some even blame a TV show! Maybe some day this will change.
As for Brigadier, if he relies on the Argentino history books, it is no wonder he thinks the way he do, and of course he also dislikes when foreigners critizise his country - most people do.
The Argentino history books - especially those used in the schools - are as full of outright lies, half lies/half truths and nationalistic crap as most history books in the first world were only 30-40 years ago. Today most of the outright lies have been removed from most first world history books, only part of the half lies/half truths and nationalistic crap remains.
An example: When I went to school, we were told that our country was among the three first to abandon slavery. An outright lie, known to the nationalist idiot author. Thruth is that it was one of the three first countries to abandon slave trade, but somewhere in the middle to abandon actual slavery, albeit 20 years earlier than e.g. the US of A. Today this has been replaced by a condemnation of the late abolisment of slavery and the exact data and dates.
I have two Argentino history books, neither of which describes Julio Argentino Roca as "El assassino", only briefly descibes the "Conquista del Desierto" and don't mention that it was genocide. They also don't mention that even late in the 19th century there was a shooting prize to anyone who brought in a pair of "indian" ears.
To find the truth about the "Conquista del Desierto" you have to turn to foreign sources, although a few Argentinos like Dr. Miguel Delmagro who descibes it as "La campaña del destierro" and also Herman Schiller, Osvaldo Bayer, Profesor de Historia Jorge Stitzman and Luis Bruschtein have written scorching accounts of the genocide - met, of course, with hate from flaming nationalists.
I am reminded of "La campaña del destierro" every day, as I live on the corner of calle Julio A. Roca