Besazo -- The Gay Community's Way Of Protest

[D.B. Cooper]

They weren't arrested for kissing in public. That was a lie. They were arrested for smoking in the subway & resisting arrest.
One of the lesbians was smoking in the subway station. One of the subway male workers approached her & told her to put out her cigarette. She responded that she didn't see a "No Smoking" sign. She continued to smoke. He called a police officer.
And that's where things got out of hand. [background=rgb(252, 252, 252)]Punching an officer in the face & kicking him in the groin will get you arrested every time.[/background]

https://www.youtube....h?v=2Gye6OuM5VY

 

[khairyexpat]

That was a lie.

Finally the truth.

Do you find that ... LGBT`s are attention seekers?
If you come cross and don`t notice (same way you would with heterosexual), ... they would force themselves in your face.

Sounds like .... these 2 were out to get some attention !!!

Very much doubt it was for kissing.
Do yo really think anyone here would give a hoot ..... let alone the pobre Policia Argentina?

 

[Ceviche]

Do you find that ... LGBT`s are attention seekers?
If you come cross and don`t notice (same way you would with heterosexual), ... they would force themselves in your face.

Seems you have some deeply ingrained phobia or dislike for LGBT community. There are good and bad hetrosexuals ; There are are good and bad LGBT ppl. Please dont generalize.

 

[D.B. Cooper]

Finally the truth.

Do you find that ... LGBT`s are attention seekers?
If you come cross and don`t notice (same way you would with heterosexual), ... they would force themselves in your face.

Sounds like .... these 2 were out to get some attention !!!

Very much doubt it was for kissing.
Do yo really think anyone here would give a hoot ..... let alone the pobre Policia Argentina?

Well the term "Drama Queen" comes to mind. "Not that there's anything wrong with that" !!!.
But who can resist an opportunity for a "smooch in"

 

[khairyexpat]

You may or not be a troll, but many of your comments are troll-like.

Just another kind gentle reminder !

 

[Ceviche]

Just another kind gentle reminder !

what a easy way out , right? dont like what the other person has to say, call him a troll or abuse him//...or if the other person does not think in the same manner as you..or the other person may belong to another culture, have different social or political values than you have or different economic background than you have - but no..you can not see it..all you can do is call that person a "troll"..easy route, right! for all non-conformities with your thought process?

Then some "bully" will come to support you...and comment -- Well, "most of us" think your comments are troll like, just because some person does not think in the same manner as the "bully" does, or the person may have access to some different information than the "bully" or has had completely different life experiences than the "bully" and his followers but no sir..no no no, there is no way out - either conform or bend down in agreement with the thought process of the majority OR..the "bully" will say - We, the grand jury of this page - declare you as a troll.

One of the reasons the "bully" and his followers are enraged and refuse to listen to the other side is because of the sense of superiority. Only I know better, kind of superiority. In psychology, its called the Dunning-Kruger effect - where people of low ability suffer from illusory superiority. The Dunning - Kruger effect requires a minimal degree of knowledge and experience in the area about which you are ignorant( and ignorant of your ignorance) and that seems to be the major problem with the "bully" and his/her followers. The "bully" and his croonies are incredibly stupid, but how can he/she and their croonies realize they are so stupid ( you have to be relatively be intelligent to realize how stupid you are!!) . So I have empathy for the "bully" and his/her croonies who would like to believe they are superior and know everything about the city/country we live in and anybody who thinks otherwise has problems with English Grammar ( also a effect of Dunning - Kruger thinking your grammar is better) or is a troll or certain political agenda but not realize, how stupid they themselves are!

Over!

 

[Bajo_cero2]

They weren't arrested for kissing in public. That was a lie. They were arrested for smoking in the subway & resisting arrest.
One of the lesbians was smoking in the subway station. One of the subway male workers approached her & told her to put out her cigarette. She responded that she didn't see a "No Smoking" sign. She continued to smoke. He called a police officer.
And that's where things got out of hand. [background=rgb(252, 252, 252)]Punching an officer in the face & kicking him in the groin will get you arrested every time.[/background]

https://www.youtube....h?v=2Gye6OuM5VY

You cannot be arrested for smoking. Police has nothing to do there. They might be fined with luck.

 

[semigoodlookin]

You cannot be arrested for smoking. Police has nothing to do there. They might be fined with luck.

I don't think he said she was arrested for smoking. They were smoking, refused to stop, a policeman was called. It was not said the policeman intended to arrest them, but they turned violent, which does warrant an arrest.

 

[Gringoboy]

There is no free press, only paid one.

Says the professional secret expert who supported the government that banned supermarkets from advertising their special offers in the national press, in spite of the 'precios cuidados' fiasco and the very same government that led a hate campaign against Clarin under the banner of Clarin Miente, spearheaded by non other than Willy 'El Pistolero' Moreno. Oh, and that little exercise was paid for by the tax payer, a fact which has brought said Willy under investigfation.

 

[julian63]

You cannot be arrested for smoking. Police has nothing to do there. They might be fined with luck.

I find this a curious fact (especially the "with luck" embellishment) assuming it is a fact, that is.
In the jurisdictions with which I am familiar, there are some public offenses which are punishable just by a fine and not by arrest and incarceration. However, when a police officer tells a violator of such an offense to stop doing it and the violator then refuses, that constitutes a different, more serous violation (e.g., interference with law enforcement, willful refusal to follow a legal police directive, etc) which may properly subject the violator to arrest. In most civil societies a citizen can not refuse to obey a proper, legal directive from a police officer. It constitutes an offense for which arrest is correct.
For example, jaywalking may be simply a finable "non-arrestable" offense, but if the jaywalker continues to cross the street back and forth after a cop tells him to stop, he then can (and should ) be arrested. At least where I come from. Ditto for a police directive to "stand back" at a crime scene or public disturbance. Not to do so is an interference with proper police actions and will subject a person who refuses to do so to arrest.