Someone may want to be Dominated by KGB Putin .....or Mao followers Lots of Luck ,, Mati
Domination is domination, I still prefer to be autonomous and sovereign as every constitution stands for, BUT, if we talk of reality, theres always accumulation of power geoplotically.
If we judge with history, when we where under the UK victorian domination we were a lot much better than under the US. We didnt have coups, dissappeared people, dictatorships for minorities, economically was the best time ever, as Roca said we were "the best jewel of the British crown".
But both dominations were clearly different, one brought trains, brought prosper, they lent us money with The Baring Brothers, make this land a prosperous land. The other imposed governments, killed people, trained militars to kill, to torture and disappear, privatised everything, make us took debt, unemployment, worse crises ever. Of course I m not saying it was the US fault of all these, its just that there were always interests from the US, and they all gone in that direction, and they sure colaborated a lot to made that happened.
This new world up to now presents itself as more balanced (not concentrated in one super power), and in every speech they mentioned policies to the region, they are in the right path, in the correct direction: nuclear energy, oil, trains so Brazil and Arg could export to Asia via Argentina, Chile and Peru, creation of a bank to compeete with IMF, and a long etcetera. Its not financial capitalism, its not casino capitalism, it is not the World Bank, or the BID or the IMF, it sounds like productive capitalism, it sounds of development, of course it is better if they make us put some value added, if we dont re-primerise our exports like we did with the UK. I think theres an open door to industry, these investments on infraestructure invite me with ilussion.