Citizenship and migration DNU declared unconstitutional June 30th 2026

You can apply with a lawyer at any moment.
Thanks @Bajo_cero2 I appreciate your input and always enjoy your inside views into citizenship.

I have one question. If I applied today (1 year of residency completed with a wife who is an Argentinian citizen) with a lawyer for citizenship, the courts would still only choose to resolve my case after the 2 years of residency are fulfilled?
 
Thanks @Bajo_cero2 I appreciate your input and always enjoy your inside views into citizenship.

I have one question. If I applied today (1 year of residency completed with a wife who is an Argentinian citizen) with a lawyer for citizenship, the courts would still only choose to resolve my case after the 2 years of residency are fulfilled?
Not to speak for him, but... my understanding is that @Bajo_cero2's view has always been that you should have applied the moment you set foot in Argentina, you did not need to wait. And you would need a lawyer like him, to do so. That is the basic premise of his approach -- applying on constitutional basis through a judge. Of course it is better if you're married; so then you should have applied immediately on getting married.

I'm 13 months in and still with Precaria (remote provinces). As @Bajo_cero2 said, "2. Today is almost impossible to apply for citizenship without a lawyer. You have to litigate in order that the case is accepted."

We've been advised however to let Migraciones conclude the current process for my DNI. I'm not sure I agree with this but given the courts are in turmoil, it was suggested to me that it may be better to just get DNI sorted first (it can take a lot longer if we now restart the process of getting DNI, via juzgado federal).
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure I agree with this but given the courts are in turmoil, it was suggested to me that it may be better to just get DNI sorted first (it can take a lot longer if we now restart the process of getting DNI, via juzgado federal).
What does a federal court have to do with your DNI?
 
What does a federal court have to do with your DNI?
If you don't get DNI through Migraciones, you can (or could, in the past) ask the courts to issue you a DNI in special circumstances. But I was told that often takes longer, since the courts are slow. I don't think it applies to just anyone. A case must be made for it, a special plea if you will.
 
Last edited:
Thanks @Bajo_cero2 I appreciate your input and always enjoy your inside views into citizenship.

I have one question. If I applied today (1 year of residency completed with a wife who is an Argentinian citizen) with a lawyer for citizenship, the courts would still only choose to resolve my case after the 2 years of residency are fulfilled?
Marriage is on because is at Law 346. The idea is the limit of the Presidential power is abolish decree by decree.
 
If you don't get DNI through Migraciones, you can (or could, in the past) ask the courts to issue you a DNI in special circumstances. But I was told that often takes longer, since the courts are slow. I don't think it applies to just anyone. A case must be made for it, a special plea if you will.
No. Federal Courts only enact citizenship letters.
 
Bajo_cero2, without asking you to name courts: where is the resistance concentrated right now ? Mesa de entradas refusing to take filings, judges archiving after acceptance , or fiscales opposing? And does "litigate to get it accepted" mean an apelación/queja every time, or does citing Yang + the Sala III ruling usually do the job at first instance outside CABA? Thanks
The problem is CABA.
 
Back
Top