Yeah, it's ridiculous that's it's not a political debate, considering how many people have to rent (either temporary and paying 1 months commission, or traditional and paying 2 months seguro de caucion), and how many rent out ther homes and have to pay commission for long-term rentals.Those are monopolies and domestic protections that the libertarian leader has no plans to address. Those regulations protect the entrenched businesses who enabled his presidency. Decrees and laws set during the dictatorship of the 70s which still exist today for the same reason they did at that time.
As this recent opinion piece attempts to explain:
![]()
El control de precios que mantiene cautiva a la industria inmobiliaria
El sistema de colegios inmobiliarios y la matrícula obligatoria, heredados de decretos de la dictadura y reforzados en democracia, mantienen trabado al mercado con controles de precios, burocracia y privilegios corporativos. Para muchos especialistas, liberar la competencia es clave para...www-ambito-com.translate.goog
Though similar issues have existed in US for decades as well. Not laws, just old-fashion conspiracy and collusion. Only last year the Supreme Court ruled against the antitrust practices of the National Association of Realtors (NAR) and their terms of accessing the Multiple Listing Service (MLS). On paper this was supposed to lower commission costs for consumers, but reports are that not much has changed so far one year later.
It's a massive cost for many people in society, yet there's no political debate to do away if it. It's crazy. But, as you mentioned, it's the corruption.