PhilinBSAS
Registered
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2010
- Messages
- 580
- Likes
- 298
LostinBA said:The truth is that they can't compete on quality nor price (nor really innovation for that matter). Show me one thing that is designed and/or made here for export that is of matching or higher quality irrespective of price or if of lessor quality, is sufficiently cost-effective to make up the difference.
The answer is nothing. Only commodities and some wines and beef are export worthy.
Why is this? Is the Argentine mentality just basically incapable? My personal believe is that they have the inherent capability to compete internationally but as a nation, they're simply too corrupt and lazy to really achieve anything. The growth rate of the last 9 years has been fueled by high commodity prices, a refusal to pay back what they were loaned and a bounce from the very bottom. It's all coming back now though...only a matter of time and the sitting government knows they're lying to everyone, hence saving in dollars. Wankers.
Anyone disagree?
Yes I do disagree!
Terms of trade globally have switched in the 1990's onwards in favour of primary producers so commodities such as soya can and should form a viable basis for national economic growth.
Common fallacy to think that only path to economic development is "making things" i.e bashing metal
The issue for Argentina is how further development might ride on the back of comparative advantage of primary products.
Can anyone seriously suggest that Brazil is any less corrupt than Argentina? Need to look for other factors rather than rest on comforting stereotypical prejudices of supposed "national character"
Anglo-Saxon model of free international trade/"liberalism when is suites us but no way when it doesn't" has historically benefited the industrialised north (terms of trade again) but it isnt working that great at the moment is it?!!
If you want to smile just read the first couple of pages of this ...
http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons/lib/research/rp99/rp99-014.pdf
To be informed about what the K Governmental is seeking to do then helpful to read up about Raúl Prebisch!
K Government macro-economic strategy since 2001 has lent on this however bi-polar their political efforts are in implementing this in practice - which is another matter but one I think we can all agree about!