Electricity Shortcuts

You cannot name streets with the name of somebody who is alive.

I was not aware of this, thank you for letting me know.

Honestly, I rather like the naming conventions here, although it can be confusing for foreigners. I saw a story about events in India and at first glance thought it was happening on the BsAS street named Republica de la India.
 
Are you kidding me? And those people who own a private road and name it after themselves? In Italy, it is allowed. Even if there are other people living on the same street. You just have to pay.

This is the law here. To name streets with somebody's name who is alive is typical of fascism. Well, you said it, Italy...
 
Cristina is making sure no one ever forgets Nestor: http://ponelenestoratodo.tumblr.com/
 
Cristina is making sure no one ever forgets Nestor: http://ponelenestoratodo.tumblr.com/

This is the demagogic part of Kirchnerismo which I am not comfortable with. Its like when Cristina was reelected: "Que Dios, la patria y ÉL me lo demanden"
They do it every time they can. I believe Nestor was a good president, but I think he was a thief too, I mean, he and Cristina were menemistas, theres a youtube video of Nestor talking in favour of YPF privatization, Fondos de Santa Cruz missing... they were very corrupted, as everyone in the 90s, you have to be corrupt to get those charges.
So, as I think he was a good president with his politics, I also think he robbed millions and millions from public funds.

I dont like to see his name everywhere.
 
This is the demagogic part of Kirchnerismo which I am not comfortable with. Its like when Cristina was reelected: "Que Dios, la patria y ÉL me lo demanden"
They do it every time they can. I believe Nestor was a good president, but I think he was a thief too, I mean, he and Cristina were menemistas, theres a youtube video of Nestor talking in favour of YPF privatization, Fondos de Santa Cruz missing... they were very corrupted, as everyone in the 90s, you have to be corrupt to get those charges.
So, as I think he was a good president with his politics, I also think he robbed millions and millions from public funds.

I dont like to see his name everywhere.

How can you think he is a good president whilst also believing he has robbed the country blind. :rolleyes:
Only in Argentina....
 
How can you think he is a good president whilst also believing he has robbed the country blind. :rolleyes:
Only in Argentina....

Exactly, everyone is corrupted, the past, the current and the next one. Theres no difference of ideology, etc, everyone is a thief.

So if everybody robs it doesnt make a difference. Corruption is constant, its not a variable to consider.
 
I don't get this idea that somehow Argentina is so much more corrupt than almost anywhere else.

Maybe in the micro level, we have the taxi driver, the verdulero, the butcher, the public inspector... and the big entrepreneur, the CEO, the bussinessmen...

argentine people is the one that are corrupted, not only politicians.
 
No self employed plumber, gardener etc in the UK declares 100% of his earnings to the taxman and the UK. And we don't have to falsify our earnings because we have much lower tax rates than Argentina.

The degree to which the state and big business and finance colludes with each other in the UK is utterly corrupt. The Iraq war, the bank bailouts, Libor scandal, cash for questions (politicians and police), widespread abuse of MP expenses, Jesus, I could go on and on!
 
How much of a problem is it for the plumber in the UK to cheat his client, as well, at every turn? Everyone complains about the government and what they take, but how many complain about the client and excuse taking more from them? And before you answer this, I swear you need to have some personal experience with trying to get things fixed here, particularly from plumbers :D

Also, I'd make a comment about the level of taxes here - I agree that Argentina has a high tax burden, but it surprises me to hear that it's higher than the UK, or at least significantly so _ I admit to ignorance. But even so, does the level of taxation make a difference as to whether it's better or not to try to evade paying them? Personally, I don't think so, but I do think a level of corruption, and what you get for the money you put in, is a valid reason. But I'm a renegade, as well, who believes the power of the government comes from the people and not the State. Some will say that's an excuse, and I won't argue the point.

In may places it is acceptable to try to hide at least some income from the government (how many waiters and waitresses in the US declare tips if they have a choice?) and while in its strictest sense of the word is indeed corruption, I think we're talking about more direct impact when talking about private people being corrupt.

There is a saying I've heard here before (paraphrased) - if someone here has a chance to screw another over and doesn't take it, he's an idiot. Fortunately that is not an example of most of my experience here, but I've seen and experienced enough of it that is has to be more than the average compared to where I come from.

There was a pool last year in one of the papers asking Argentinos what they thought of corruption. I can't remember the details, but basically the answer came back that a near majority of the people were OK with corruption as long as it benefited them...
 
Back
Top