"VMSmith" said:
Yeah, Jesus wept alright. He wept for those who use Wikipedia as some sort of authoritative reference (known as "stupidism").
Now let's look at a broader, more authoritative set of definitions...
http://tinyurl.com/469jyt
Are you actually making an effort to appear stupid?
First off, your authoritative collection of web based definitions of racism incorporates the common legally accepted definition of racism which is prejudice based on race or ethnicity - which includes nationality. Kind of invalidates your point a little bucko, but hey, given my "profound ignorance" maybe I'm missing something...
Secondly, had you bothered to read the wiki-link, you would have found the accepted UN definition of racism - the globally agreed standard. But then given that wikilinks are "stupidism" I guess someone of your masterful intellect has no need for referenced links covering accepted legal definitions. Not when there are google crawlers anyway.
Anyway, enough. If you want to wear your ignorance and bigotry as a badge of honour, good luck to you.
rmartin - if you want to make crude generalisations based on race or ethnicity you can expect be called racist. Simple as. If you don't like it, don't do it. Whingeing about Hitler comparisons just makes you look even more pathetic.
Anyway, sun is shining, its a beautiful winters day in Buenos Aires and I'm going to enjoy the company of my friends and colleagues, and do something more productive than argue with narrow minded bigots and pedants.