We're in a dispute with our landlord. Basically, we rented our apartment in Dec 2022 under the old 3 year rental law with annual increases. Our contract stipulates the expenses we'll pay in accordance with the terms of the law at that time, so it says we shouldn't pay extraordinary expenses, but also that we're really only responsible for "habitual" expenses related to the property regardless of whether they're listed as extraordinary or ordinary common expenses.
When we rented two years ago the rent was affordable and the expenses low so we just paid everything even though we shouldn't have been (definitely a mistake). Last year, the owner started pestering us about voluntarily paying more than our contract stipulated because he didn't feel like we were paying enough, but we just reminded him that we've been paying all of the expenses and have also paid to fix things without going to him or asking to be reimbursed. We also mentioned that at the beginning of our final year, and after having our huge rental increase that comes with annual contracts (it tripled, last month we paid 1.1 million pesos (915,000 rent and 185,000 expenses) for a 2 bedroom in Villa Crespo in an older building with no amenities), that we would like to start only paying the expenses we're required to pay. We felt this was fair, especially considering we've paid all of the expenses for the last two years, take good care of the property and pay on time every month.
The owner is not taking this well. First, he refused to admit that he was responsible for any of the expenses and that everything listed was our responsibility. Then, there was a moment when he seemed to agree that maybe we shouldn't be responsible for paying the expenses related to the improvements to the Portero's apartment, but after he reverted back to simply disagreeing and saying we need to pay all of the expenses. The building administrator has been nice and answers our questions, but nothing on our expenses are broken out into ordinary or extraordinary expenses so we're basically left to just wade through them (although my understanding is also that it's more about habitual expenses rather than ordinary/extraordinary with our contract). The building is doing a lot of work on the balconies and there has been a lot of work in other units of the building which have really driven up our overall expenses and we don't feel like we should be paying for those things.
Has anyone else been through this? Or have any advice? I've researched a lot and we're going to send an email to the free legal service for tenants and owners the city offers to at least find out how we should move forward.
I also feel like there's probably a cultural tenant/landlord issue going on that, as outsiders, I'd love more insight on. Our total rent plus expenses payment last month was 1.1 million pesos, so asking to remove 57k pesos for things on the expenses related to repairs in other units and improvements done in the portero's apartment really doesn't seem unreasonable to me. Thoughts?
When we rented two years ago the rent was affordable and the expenses low so we just paid everything even though we shouldn't have been (definitely a mistake). Last year, the owner started pestering us about voluntarily paying more than our contract stipulated because he didn't feel like we were paying enough, but we just reminded him that we've been paying all of the expenses and have also paid to fix things without going to him or asking to be reimbursed. We also mentioned that at the beginning of our final year, and after having our huge rental increase that comes with annual contracts (it tripled, last month we paid 1.1 million pesos (915,000 rent and 185,000 expenses) for a 2 bedroom in Villa Crespo in an older building with no amenities), that we would like to start only paying the expenses we're required to pay. We felt this was fair, especially considering we've paid all of the expenses for the last two years, take good care of the property and pay on time every month.
The owner is not taking this well. First, he refused to admit that he was responsible for any of the expenses and that everything listed was our responsibility. Then, there was a moment when he seemed to agree that maybe we shouldn't be responsible for paying the expenses related to the improvements to the Portero's apartment, but after he reverted back to simply disagreeing and saying we need to pay all of the expenses. The building administrator has been nice and answers our questions, but nothing on our expenses are broken out into ordinary or extraordinary expenses so we're basically left to just wade through them (although my understanding is also that it's more about habitual expenses rather than ordinary/extraordinary with our contract). The building is doing a lot of work on the balconies and there has been a lot of work in other units of the building which have really driven up our overall expenses and we don't feel like we should be paying for those things.
Has anyone else been through this? Or have any advice? I've researched a lot and we're going to send an email to the free legal service for tenants and owners the city offers to at least find out how we should move forward.
I also feel like there's probably a cultural tenant/landlord issue going on that, as outsiders, I'd love more insight on. Our total rent plus expenses payment last month was 1.1 million pesos, so asking to remove 57k pesos for things on the expenses related to repairs in other units and improvements done in the portero's apartment really doesn't seem unreasonable to me. Thoughts?