what a bunch of hooey.
there are a few very significant differences between Argentina then and the USA today-
fer instance-
Interest rates-
Argentina was paying very high interest rates- those bonds and loans they defaulted on were mostly floating rate, which changed as the world market dipped. Currently, there is a lawsuit about some of the Argentine defaults- and the quoted interest rate is 101%.
The US, on the other hand, is still able to borrow at effective rates of zero, or even NEGATIVE interest. Interest rates are supposedly set by the old "invisible hand" of the marketplace, based on risk. So that means that, at the time that Argentina defaulted, the world lenders felt it was a lousy risk. But right now, people with money still feel the USA is such a GOOD risk that they are willing to loan it money at zero percent interest.
Which means either this guy is wrong, or everybody else with money in the entire world is wrong.
then-
Propping up currency-
Argentina tried, and failed, to keep the peso at an artificial 1 to 1 with the dollar, and that was one of the reasons they kept borrowing, and that was what they could not do, and hence defaulted.
The USA, on the other hand, is letting the dollar float, more or less, and figuring that if it dives, then US manufactured goods will be more attractive, and sell more, around the world.
In other words, another example of exact OPPOSITE conditions.
There are tons of other reasons why this comparison is complete baloney. The USA is still the number one richest country in the world. Everybody with money still wants a place in NYC, or Beverly Hills.
There is just no comparison.
On the other hand, like Steve, I own rural property, with lots of in place food production capacity, and I ought to be picking apples and digging up potatoes right now. But I am not stockpiling beautiful women or automatic weapons, as my land is in one of the most desirable parts of the USA.