I'm from the UK and I guess similar tricks have been played on us.bigbadwolf said:The article does go on to explain that while this system of variable-goods was not used, it was mimicked by giving lower weightings to good rapidly rising in price. Cumulatively, annual inflation is underreported by about 7%. Thus if 2% is the official rate, a more accurate estimate would be 9%. So if an American received a pay rise of 3% (in the good days, not today) and the official rate was 2%, then by golly, he should be more prosperous than ever. And yet his or her budget was more strained than ever. And then rent-a-pundits would appear on television decrying the McMansions and SUVs, blaming the culture of consumption rather than the true culprit: higher cost of living.
BlahBlah said:I don't with what people you hang out with but all my friends who are in there 30's or 40's in Europe and have a family own atleast a 500.000 dollar home(up to 5 milion dollar) have 2 cars, go on holiday multiple times, have good jobs or own a company. And they often have a second home and/or a boat/car and have expensive hobbies
harpo said:We're always lead to believe that our standard of living is constantly getting better and better, but I think that has been in reversal for decades. if you take someone in a good solid career, say a family doctor or an architect, in what way are they better off now than in the 1950s? OK, they have a PC, wide-screen TV and various other electronic gizmos, but that's about it. In the 50's bringing up a family in a nice house with the latest equipment and a nice holiday every year was affordable - ON ONE SALARY.
First we were persuaded that every woman had a right to work (quite right, too), then it became normality, Soon after a necessity. Eventually a lot of families could hardly survive with both adults working - a big problem when everything depends on consumptiona and growth. The answer? Debt - make it easy and sociably acceptable to borrow, borrow, borrow.
We've just seen where that leads to. I guess the 20th century has just ended - the 21st will be interesting!
bigbadwolf said:This is not the general rule in Europe, where a whole generation of young people is getting by on 1,000 euros a month as salary. The people who own the kind of house you're talking about and didn't inherit it are probably deeply in debt. If you look at per capita income figures and compare them with the general cost of living, what I am saying will make sense. The majority of people do not have "good jobs" or own companies.
That $500,000 plus house, holidays, etc is paid for on debt.BlahBlah said:I don't with what people you hang out with but all my friends who are in there 30's or 40's in Europe and have a family own atleast a 500.000 dollar home(up to 5 milion dollar) have 2 cars, go on holiday multiple times, have good jobs or own a company. And they often have a second home and/or a boat/car and have expensive hobbies
I didn't see that change the last 10-15 years. In Spain this is changing but that's a country that is really hard hit by the crisis. Probally the same for a country like Ireland
BlahBlah said:England is not Europe. There are still plenty of places in Europe where houseprices are not going down or just slowly