ICE killed US citizen in Minneapolis

[wineguy999]

Venezuelans who voted for him can not be deported since they’re US citizens. You can’t vote if you’re not a citizen. You are spreading disinformation.

Until the time comes when they start revoking citizenship.

 

[Lanick]

Until the time comes when they start revoking citizenship.

And you believe that disinformation shared by some nonsense media. Can you please show some evidence to support that hearsay?

 

[wineguy999]

And you believe that disinformation shared by some nonsense media. Can you please show some evidence to support that hearsay?

I'm not sure what "hearsay" you're speaking of. Perhaps your reading comprehension is not what it once was?

 

[Lanick]

I'm not sure what "hearsay" you're speaking of. Perhaps your reading comprehension is not what it once was?

There is no evidence or any supporting thing that confirms what you are saying. Who told you that they will revoke their citizenship? Do you think this is possible? Constitution? Law?

 

[Gringo80]

Looking at the video, she wasn't moving her car she drove it into the officer and kept going. Very sad. FAFO.

 

[wineguy999]

There is no evidence or any supporting thing that confirms what you are saying. Who told you that they will revoke their citizenship? Do you think this is possible? Constitution? Law?

The only evidence I need to support my opinion that immigrants could very well be stripped of their citizenship is what I've heard and read. That opinion is based on more than one statement/musing/desire that has come out of the Quarter Pounder hole of El Caudillo del Mar-a-Lago on more than one occasion.

He has said publicly that he would strip immigrants of naturalization status 'In a heartbeat', and presumably, it is already in the works. He also signed an executive order attempting to end birthright citizenship, which is guaranteed by the Constitution. These things are facts, not opinions.

In answer to your questions:
Who told me? Trump himself, in December 2025 re: denaturalizing, asking for 100-200 denaturalizing cases per month in fiscal 2026; on 20 January 2025 re: birthright citizenship, through executive order
Do I think this is possible? I absolutely think it is possible, believe it is possible, and believe it may have already been enacted
Constitution? Trump and his minions have nothing but distain for the Constitution
Law? Trump would never let a little thing like that stand in his way, and he made clear just last night that his interpretation of law is the only one that matters

You referred to it as "nonsense media". Since it came from Trump's mouth (and pen), I suppose you must be right.

 

[Lanick]

The only evidence I need to support my opinion that immigrants could very well be stripped of their citizenship is what I've heard and read. That opinion is based on more than one statement/musing/desire that has come out of the Quarter Pounder hole of El Caudillo del Mar-a-Lago on more than one occasion.

He has said publicly that he would strip immigrants of naturalization status 'In a heartbeat', and presumably, it is already in the works. He also signed an executive order attempting to end birthright citizenship, which is guaranteed by the Constitution. These things are facts, not opinions.

In answer to your questions:
Who told me? Trump himself, in December 2025 re: denaturalizing, asking for 100-200 denaturalizing cases per month in fiscal 2026; on 20 January 2025 re: birthright citizenship, through executive order
Do I think this is possible? I absolutely think it is possible, believe it is possible, and believe it may have already been enacted
Constitution? Trump and his minions have nothing but distain for the Constitution
Law? Trump would never let a little thing like that stand in his way, and he made clear just last night that his interpretation of law is the only one that matters

You referred to it as "nonsense media". Since it came from Trump's mouth (and pen), I suppose you must be right.

Your opinion based on what you heard leaves me speechless!
I’m sure he would do it at a heartbeat but he can not! He would but can not because of the law!
Anyone who got citizenship untruthfully can be stripped off their citizenship but that’s not possible for law abiding individuals! Like in the case of Chinese people in Argentina, who became citizens for a while but got stripped off once it came out that their applications were based on fake info or something similar. Not because they’re foreigners and not wanted but it was not a genuine and legit application.
Birthright citizenship is not a given right. You can’t give rights or revoke for any person not born yet. UK did that as well many years ago. Also it may be a good thing since many people travel to US or to Argentina to get citizenship for their kids or for themselves just for convenience.
You only say; “think, believe, opinion” over a statement you’ve made.

 

[LongtimeExpat]

Your opinion based on what you heard leaves me speechless!
I’m sure he would do it at a heartbeat but he can not! He would but can not because of the law!
Anyone who got citizenship untruthfully can be stripped off their citizenship but that’s not possible for law abiding individuals! Like in the case of Chinese people in Argentina, who became citizens for a while but got stripped off once it came out that their applications were based on fake info or something similar. Not because they’re foreigners and not wanted but it was not a genuine and legit application.
Birthright citizenship is not a given right. You can’t give rights or revoke for any person not born yet. UK did that as well many years ago. Also it may be a good thing since many people travel to US or to Argentina to get citizenship for their kids or for themselves just for convenience.
You only say; “think, believe, opinion” over a statement you’ve made.

Things Trump did, so far, that have been reversed by the courts, because they were against the law, but he did them anyway.

Reversed or Struck Down Actions (2025–2026)

• F-1 Student Visa Revocations: Following more than 100 lawsuits and 50 restraining orders, the administration was forced to reverse its decision and restore F-1 foreign student visa registrations on or about April 25, 2025.
• National Guard Deployments in Cities: The Supreme Court definitively barred the deployment of National Guard troops to Chicago on December 23, 2025, ruling against the president's broad claim of power to deploy military forces in U.S. cities.
• Use of the 1798 Alien Enemies Act: The Supreme Court ruled against the administration's use of this wartime act to deport Venezuelan nationals during peacetime, ordering a pause on these deportations and mandating due process.
• Wrongful Deportations: In April 2025, the Supreme Court twice ordered the administration to facilitate the return of individuals who were "secretly whisked" out of the country without a judicial hearing, specifically citing a case involving a man wrongly deported to El Salvador.
• Appointment of Acting U.S. Attorneys: Federal courts have disqualified at least five acting U.S. Attorneys appointed by Trump (including John Sarcone in New York and Alina Habba in New Jersey), ruling they were serving unlawfully after their 120-day terms expired.
• Attacks on Head Start: A federal judge granted a preliminary injunction on September 11, 2025, halting what was described as "unlawful attacks" on Head Start families, including attempts to purge "DEI" language and restrict grant funding.
• Withholding Authorized Foreign Aid: The Supreme Court turned down an administration request to stay a lower court order, thereby requiring the executive branch to pay nearly $2 billion in reimbursements to nonprofits and businesses for authorized foreign assistance.
• Targeting of Pro-Palestinian Students: A federal court in Massachusetts ruled on September 30, 2025, that the administration's policy of selectively detaining and deporting noncitizen students who participated in pro-Palestinian protests violated the First Amendment and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).

There's a long, long list of things that he has done that have also been challenged are are awaiting court decisions and may also be reversed/struck down, including most of the tariffs.

The great weakness of the law, which Trump has exploited like no other, is that many times you first must do something, which must then be challenged in the courts even if it's clearly illegal, and which can sometimes take a lot of time, before it can be reversed.

It's been done in Argentina extremely commonly in the more than 20 years I've lived here, by all administrations, via DNUs.

 

[wineguy999]

Your opinion based on what you heard leaves me speechless!
I’m sure he would do it at a heartbeat but he can not! He would but can not because of the law!
Anyone who got citizenship untruthfully can be stripped off their citizenship but that’s not possible for law abiding individuals! Like in the case of Chinese people in Argentina, who became citizens for a while but got stripped off once it came out that their applications were based on fake info or something similar. Not because they’re foreigners and not wanted but it was not a genuine and legit application.
Birthright citizenship is not a given right. You can’t give rights or revoke for any person not born yet. UK did that as well many years ago. Also it may be a good thing since many people travel to US or to Argentina to get citizenship for their kids or for themselves just for convenience.
You only say; “think, believe, opinion” over a statement you’ve made.

Man, that Kool-Aid must be delicious. Your faith in the law surviving a grifter with SCOTUS in his pocket is admirable, but so far it's looking like he can get away with whatever he wishes. But good to know that you can foresee the future, and it will all be okay.

Birthright citizenship not a given right? I wonder how I got that US passport. Maybe something to do with the 14th Amendment.

 

[LuckyLuke]

Looking at the video, she wasn't moving her car she drove it into the officer and kept going. Very sad. FAFO.

There's really not a whole lot we can gather from the few seconds. I've seen this behavior before though, where a cop will intentionally place himself in front of the car to justify lethal force if the driver moves forward. Whether this is proper police protocol is I'm sure a question the whole country is asking right now...