I strongly believe than no one, not even the more fanatic dumb dogmatic kirchnerista, can sincerely support the economic measures they have been taking from a couple of years to today.
Of course these measures every one for separate, has a purpose, has a meaning (for example, context, capitals outflow, etc) but the way they manage the whole situation, arrogantly, thinking they re the kings and can do whatever they want with their 'kingdom', pushing certain civil liberties, limiting manouvre margins of big important political and economical actors, like parties or big enterprizes, while they steal and support that stealing, while they control population absurdly, plus the content of the measures itselves, I mean, who can support the price controls, who can ever think that that measure is something that take us somewhere and not a desesperate attempt to stop the inevitable, all this, is an evidence that this deepening of the model is the main cause of the less support they have, and that they re getting more and more isolated.
As I said many times before, there are strong signs of decadence of Kirchnerismo. It seems they didnt think investment is important, and now they re totally realising how wrong they were, that every economy has a strong dependency on capitals, and even in a socialist paradise, probably the origin or the goal these young people had in mind in the 70s (which I would say it sounds good to my ears but clearly is not realistic), the inicial investment is totally necessary.
After the Cordobazo in 1969, investment (particularly external investment) went down like by an 80%. It was tremendous. I wish I can find a link that show this expressly, but its futile to search it cause i wont find it. So believe me. It was a dictatorship, the big international capitals had -apparently- the country under control. But a protest originally by students grew up and then a lot of industrial workmen joined and they took control of the second city of the country, for more than 24 hours. Then a lot of troops were send from Buenos Aires, and the repression and violence, as usual in these cases, etc. But a protest, also with a strong cultural aspect (like the mini skirt slogan), could beat the police and governed the second city and more industrial zone of the country for a day.
That was the begining of the end of that dictatorship. The year after the Cordobazo, the private investment went dramatically down and those capitals who went out of the country would come back lagter with Videla, a much more stronger dictatorship that would not allow a Cordobazo by any chance.
I dont know how I got here. Probably because Kirchnerismo is a direct son of Cordobazo, of its aspirations, of its slogans, its dreams, its proclamations, etc. That was the farthest the socialist idea came in this country, and after that event emerged the Izquierda Peronista, with its particular aspects, different guerrilas, etc.
