This is most likely a temp rental with no garantia. Eviction is VERY difficult and there are no escribanos involved.
For me, it's a two-year contract with garantia. Maybe you were talking about the OP?
And as Bajo mentioned, I
could stay here and it
would be very difficult for them to evict me - with minors in the household it could take years. But of course, I'd be screwing over the people whose garantia I used, as the courts would probably come after them to pressure me to leave. I can't do that.
As far as the landlord entering and throwing things in the street, I can't imagine the world of hurt that would come down on the landlord at that moment, or that scenario would already be happening in many places around the city and owners wouldn't have to ask for garantias - they could just ask for bigger deposits to take care of the damages that may occur in the apartment. I've heard about owners having a nightmare with renters in their apartment that won't pay and won't leave. I don't actually know anyone personally who this has happened to, but garantias are requirements for a reason.
Garryl, the kinds of rentals you're talking about exist, but they are not likely to be home to the expats you're talking about - cheap places outside the city exist and I know people who live in them, anywhere from villas (where gangsters or mafiosos own the building - I know a couple of people who live in the Retiro villa) to very humble abodes (one of my brothers-in-law lived in a one-room shack with his wife and their baby, that was tied on to the side of a lower-middle class house out in San Fernando, for example). I could see the owner throwing them out if they didn't pay. And I'm sure it happens in other places as well, but it's not the norm.
Indeed, the very fact that people would stay in an apartment and not pay rent
because they can by law is the big reason for garantias, not damages (although damages do figure in that).
And Serafina, I thought the same thing as you about the title to the property when the owners are entering into a contract with a renter. We found our apartment via Remax, which is a big, expensive chain here in Argentina (and I'm familiar with them in the States). The absolute last thing I expected when contracting this apartment was that the title was disputed in court already. In fact, when the sisters came over to tell us the bad news, they brought the real estate agent from Remax who they worked with. I tried to ask her the same thing about escribanos and titles and she looked at me uncomfortably, shrugged her shoulders and I couldn't get anything more out of her. But then, she was the owners' real estate agent, not mine.
I would be completely and thoroughly ashamed to sit in my apartment and not pay the rent. Just because they are shameless enough to screw me over, I can't do the same. It was a verbal agreement that we wanted to stay and that they wanted us to. I signed a two-year lease. The contract says I have to let them show the apartment, within certain parameters, and they can't kick me out until my contract is up even if they sell it before my contract is up. But once it's up, they can not renew the contract and for me to stay would be shameless.
I abide by my word even if the owners don't. Two wrongs really don't make a right, they just both screw everyone up.
As far as the OP's situation, it sucks, but it's pretty common here from my experience and those of others I know, if indeed the owners are in the wrong. It's a shame, and part of living in Argentina. If you have the time and money and feel like it's something you should go after, look up a lawyer and pay him a fee to consult and tell you where you stand. Or, Nikad had posted some information in another thread some few weeks ago, talking about a non-judicial (I believe it was) group that helps renters with their rights. If the owner is in the wrong, it would be good to let them feel the wrath of their own laws, if the process, cost and time is something you can tolerate.