BTW - I find it real hard to understand why the Argentines think the Falklands should be part of Argentina. No matter what happened in the past, for a long time it has been a UK territory. It has a UK population, not at all related to Argentina. It has been solidly a British possession since the early 1800s.
Argentina had only had the Falklands for a few decades, and before that it was contested between Spain, France and Britain. In fact, Britain was there before Argentina and even Spain - they tied the French as the first to land parties on the island.
In some ways, it would be bigger than giving Texas back to Mexico.
Texas declared independence from Mexico two years after Argentina lost the Falklands to the British (i.e., this all took place in the same relative time frame). In fact, Texas has a much bigger Mexican population (way, way, way bigger, by millions) than the Falklands have an Argentine, or even Latino, population.
Imagine if Mexico were to tell the US to give Texas back!
Alright, I admit that Texas is a lot closer to the US than the Falklands are to Argentina. But still...after awhile, it's time to give it up.
I would liken the Argentine's invasion of the Falklands to be something similar to the Japanese war in the Pacific (not scale at all, just some of the motivation). The Japanese figured the pacific islands were theirs because they were closer and they could take it. Of course, one non-similarity was that at least the Japanese figured at least some of the ancestors of those islands came from Japan. Argentina didn't even have that strong of a claim (in 1982). But in both cases, the inhabitants of those islands didn't want to be ruled by those who were attacking them. Thankfully the Argentine government was as good at running a war as it was at running its country...
Argentina had only had the Falklands for a few decades, and before that it was contested between Spain, France and Britain. In fact, Britain was there before Argentina and even Spain - they tied the French as the first to land parties on the island.
In some ways, it would be bigger than giving Texas back to Mexico.
Texas declared independence from Mexico two years after Argentina lost the Falklands to the British (i.e., this all took place in the same relative time frame). In fact, Texas has a much bigger Mexican population (way, way, way bigger, by millions) than the Falklands have an Argentine, or even Latino, population.
Imagine if Mexico were to tell the US to give Texas back!
Alright, I admit that Texas is a lot closer to the US than the Falklands are to Argentina. But still...after awhile, it's time to give it up.
I would liken the Argentine's invasion of the Falklands to be something similar to the Japanese war in the Pacific (not scale at all, just some of the motivation). The Japanese figured the pacific islands were theirs because they were closer and they could take it. Of course, one non-similarity was that at least the Japanese figured at least some of the ancestors of those islands came from Japan. Argentina didn't even have that strong of a claim (in 1982). But in both cases, the inhabitants of those islands didn't want to be ruled by those who were attacking them. Thankfully the Argentine government was as good at running a war as it was at running its country...