I dont think its a "good thing", or a "bad thing".
I think its the truth.
even in the USA, Starlink is so expensive that only the upper 10% or so of the population can afford it. And currently, less than a half percent of the US population has chosen to pay for it.
This is just the way it is.
I certainly would not pay that much, in any country.
And in Argentina, its obviously true that the segment of the population that could afford starlink is probably under 1% , and, frankly, I would be amazed if more than a couple of hundred thousand people out of 40 million or so will actually pony up the dollars.
(business rates are higher)
Certainly, there will be customers, but for Milei, its another example of "flooding the zone with shit", as a US political strategist named this strategy.
It is a grand announcement of an ideological victory, but it affects neither the populace of Argentina, nor the internet service market of Argentina much at all.
99% of the population will still be unserved by this, but Milei can crow over another step towards a "free" market, without really changing anything.
Currently, about 92% of argentines live in urban areas, where fiber optic would be much more efficient and economical.