I don't think there are many that want to literally defund the police. I'm sure there are a few extremists, but most sensible people who believe in reforming police practices, don't want to eliminate or totally defund them. $200 - $300k for police salaries is a bit ridiculous though. Then they probably make 75% of their salaries in retirement.
As to the police officers in Argentina, it's a shame how little resources are allocated to them. I've read some departments don't even have gasoline at times to do patrols, vehicles stay broken forever, officers are paid poverty wages. It's no wonder many of them are corrupt. Can you really blame them?
Dougie,
There really is a group, somewhat small yet very vocal, who truly want to defund police departments. They are hanging their hat on the bad job performed by a minority of the people who work in law enforcement. The thinking seems to be that if the police are not funded, then the mis deeds of a few will not occur.
This group is intent on disrupting communities and society. They are prepared to do whatever it takes and accept whatever fallout there may be, for everyone, not just themselves, in order to prevail in their agenda.
This is an angry mob of people, who are so angry, that they have lost their ability to be objective, and problem solving. They fail to see all the good that police do and all the bad that they prevent. I believe their focus should be on cleaning up the profession, holding people accountable and weeding out the poor performers who hide behind unions.
This group of people and other similar groups with radical ideas, have become the puppets of billionaires like George Soros who want to engineer society to reflect their ideals and views. The game plan is to create chaos and anarchy such that after enough craziness has happened, and the population in mentally spent, those who crave power and control can save everyone. Thus cementing their (The social engineers.) status as close to God as one can get on this earth.
There is no way, I don't care what someone's argument is, that US police officers should be making the kind of money they do. Or having the kind of retirement packages that they enjoy. They are simply over compensated at the expense of breaking the backs of the tax payers.
I have to believe there are people who are on "the outside" of the brotherhood of police, fire and emergency service workers who would be thrilled to have those jobs for less compensation. I don't have a number, but I'll throw 25% to 50% less. It still would be a very well paid profession.
All this police detailed work is nuts. There are some real pigs who gobble up all the detail pay they can. That is what boosts their numbers.
But consider this:
The average US truck driver has to work with a log book system that is the tool to monitor hours of service. The thinking is that a person can only operate their rig / truck so many hours per day or weekly period before they are fatigued. A fatigued driver is a danger on roadways. Falling asleep at the wheel and causing a serious or fatal accident as an example of what is trying to be prevented.
The industry is starved for drivers because of the hours of service rules. The government does not care about a private company, it's priority is on public safety, as it should be.
Well, taking the previous thought to this one, how can that same government justify a pig of a police officer who works 50 or 60 hours then grabs 20 to 30 more hours of detail pay in a single week? Mind you, this police officer is as human as that truck driver, yet the policeman or woman has a gun available to them in the pursuit of doing their job.
I have to believe that any human working that many hours in a week does not have solid ability to judge the use of deadly force. The fatigued factor is a definite. As you can see my point, this is a serious problem.
We need hours of service rules for police officers, emergency personnel etc ... spread the hours across more people, reduce the pay, emply more people etc ...
Given what I just stated, instead of defunding the police departments, I'd opt for privatizing them. Put them (The police departments.) in the hands of qualified private entities who would restructure and reduce waste. Simply cut costs. Privatization with oversight would be an interesting science experiment if you ask me.
This post has gotten a bit long, so I'll close with this:
The compensation of an Argentine police officer is a joke. But, one can argue that any job someone does in the country has a joke of a compensation rate. Their are Amazon workers who make more than most Argentines do. But that is the difference in first world vs developing world.
I have no important answers, but I have a few ideas as you can see.