You know, when governments try to control or direct markets, they are doing so with the political vision of whatever party is in power and can make those policies a reality against the market. I have a big problem with socialist and fascist policies because of this, but even more market-related economies make the same mistake, thinking they can control the (literal) chaos of the market place by protecting this, or lowering interest rates for that, etc. Based on what they think is important, of course.
If this country would get rid of the norm of doing things by corruption, if it would lose its desire for a mythical hero to make everything alright for everyone (which is literally impossible) and enforce the laws equally on everyone, no matter wealth or status (and yeah, I know, no country in the world has actually done that - but like working toward perfection, the harder you try, the better things can be) and let the market and entrepreneurs and people who who innovate technically have a freer range to figure things out - the government won't have to do things like "create jobs" (which, here, seems to meant he government literally employs people whether they're needed or not). That will happen automatically. Governments don't create economically productive jobs. the best they can do is make the conditions right for such a thing, but restricting those who would innovate and create true wealth isn't the way.
Argentina would find its own way as a people, not a political ideology, to compete on the global market.
Those who don't innovate or aren't entrepreneurs can have their place as well, in that industries have to have workers. When you aren't forcing wages and non-productive laws on those who are in a position to create wealth, there is more wealth available for all. (and this isn't "trickle down" theory, it's actually economics 101) Let's quit pretending that all you need to do is force rich people to give up their money for the good of all and pay unskilled workers more than their labor is worth. Let's acknowledge that the human race is greedy and selfish and let that work to our advantage instead of always trying to enforce one group of people's idea of how humans should behave on everyone (all the way from who you want to associate with, to how much money you're willing to work for).
What value, for example, is there in a guy working all his life with a hammer and a chisel to break open walls so he can get to a pipe and fix it when there are power tools available for the same job? Or employing 2-3 people to dig a ditch with hand shovels when a machine can do the work of more people than that, faster? Make work? Is that really what everyone wants? Just enough to put just enough food on the table and pretend like your happy, while your wife washes clothes in a beat-up open drum of a washing machine? (or, worse, uses boards in a tub? I know people who do that kind of work, and whose wives wash their clothes by hand)
These are the kinds of results you get here, at least, through fascism and a nac & pop ideology. Look around, it is in abundance.
Some government functionary makes a decision that X product is needed in their home country and decides to make have laws and.or policies made to reflect his politically-inspired opinion. And then when it is discovered that X product, for whatever reason, can't be produced to the benefit that was thought (or is a complete failure), the people who implemented such a policy don't back down but continue to try to ram it down everyone's throats. Usually because they don't want to admit that they were wrong. Resources (both labor, material and monetary) are wasted. Often the methods for recovery cause other problems.
I just don't understand why governments can't protect rights and let people get on with the economics of doing what they think is correct inside that framework. Central planning just isn't what it's cracked up to be, in most cases.
I've watched this government destroy the meat industry, hamper the agricultural industry, the car industry and bring down the thing I originally came here to take advantage of - the international IT industry that was starting to go full bore in 2006 when I first came. Argentina should be doing a helluva lot better than it is, but central planning by the wrong people has destroyed a lot. And the "wrong" people are often defined by the group that considers themselves the "right" people and vice versa. No one wins.
I wish that economic policy in government could be nearly non-existent, much like religion is supposed to be in the US government. After all, what are the two things you're not supposed to discuss in "polite" company? Politics and religion. Let's add Economics to that. Oh yeah, but then the people who don't want to work for their living or aren't happy because they made the decision to stop studying and improving themselves, or those who want to force everyone else to help in their manner, would say that this is just "unfair" and "unequal".
I have yet to see either in most governments worldwide, this one included. But I have seen a lot of huge inequalities visited by this system here, upon a large portion of its population, via central planning gone awry.