The one thing I can agree with Bajo on is that according to the law, these do not seem to be your rights under at least the previous government (and the current one until the laws change, whether they are enforced are not going ahead is another story). One big thing I like about libertarianism - human rights would not be determined by the whim of some super-being as divined by mere mortals, nor by flawed lawmakers or others in power, yet would be derived from nature itself. But that's another discussion. In this world, "rights" are determined by people like Cristina, Obama, Bush, et al, and their minions or handlers, depending.
Of course, where Bajo seemed to separate from what I think of the "rights" granted by the ex-queen and her minions is that he seems to think that's all a good thing, that being a tyrant is good, somehow, for the country and its people. As long as he can continue to import items according to what his queen said then he was happy and thought everyone else had the same privileges and accompanying happiness. Of course, even if everyone else did have those privileges, he's an apparently successful lawyer with lots of money (particularly with what he charges!) to buy those things he wants (with AFIP's permission), unlike most of his fellow countryfolk. Privilege seems to come from power and money and/or following the given powers like sheep and/or being complicit with the current powers. Of course, that is indeed the real world.
Interesting that Cristina considered herself the opposite, a common woman of the people, along with so many whose power and privilege stemmed from her while ostensibly trying to make the country "equalized". Pretty much the opposite of the real world, what was in her mind but with real consequences for that real world.
