Joe
Registered
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2007
- Messages
- 2,694
- Likes
- 3,113
Question: What is the drawback of default?
Answer: It will be more difficult to get credit and the the credit available will be at higher rates.
Since Argentina has had a traditional problem of having it's debt misallocated to corrupt entities wouldn't it be better to discourage undertaking debt in the future? A default would accomplish that. As well as keeping foreign reserves from draining.
Wouldn't is be better to end the uncertainty of whether or not a default will occur? After all, financial markets hate uncertainty more than anything.
And if the debt was incurred by corruption, then Argentines shouldn't be forced to repay it:
http://en.wikipedia....iki/Odious_debt
If you vote for a "Third Way" please explain.
Answer: It will be more difficult to get credit and the the credit available will be at higher rates.
Since Argentina has had a traditional problem of having it's debt misallocated to corrupt entities wouldn't it be better to discourage undertaking debt in the future? A default would accomplish that. As well as keeping foreign reserves from draining.
Wouldn't is be better to end the uncertainty of whether or not a default will occur? After all, financial markets hate uncertainty more than anything.
And if the debt was incurred by corruption, then Argentines shouldn't be forced to repay it:
In international law, odious debt, also known as illegitimate debt, is a legal theory that holds that the national debt incurred by a regime for purposes that do not serve the best interests of the nation, should not be enforceable. Such debts are, thus, considered by this doctrine to be personal debts of the regime that incurred them and not debts of the state. In some respects, the concept is analogous to the invalidity of contracts signed under coercion.
http://en.wikipedia....iki/Odious_debt
If you vote for a "Third Way" please explain.