Bajo_cero2
Registered
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2010
- Messages
- 7,949
- Likes
- 4,388
You're kidding right? As I previously stated, I'd love to be an ambassador but my age and lack of professional experience means I should not be considered, and if nominated, the correct thing to do would be politely decline.
I also don't get the "sympathy" for this woman. She could say no, she's not being drafted.
People have every right to be pissed. She will have an input on matters of financial security for a nation approaching 50,000,000 citizens.
Let me simplify this:
Worst case scenario she's just an extra yesman for Cristina on the board.
Best case scenario she's a foolish young person being given a role in handling billions of dollars/trillions of pesos, yet has never been a bank clerk and got the job because of who her dad is.
Do either of these scenarios instill confidence in you? Even the best case one is call for alarm.
You forgot history.
There is a very clear reason to choose her: loyalty.
Banco Nacion is not just a Bank, with Banco Hipotecario are the two arms to make the goverment policies hapend. It is a political assignment.
Here you have a head of the Federal Reverve who didn't want to leave when he was fired because he is a neoliberal who didn't want to use the federal reserves to pay the international debt, seems that he wanted to take more loans to pay loans (Redrado), a vice President who was plotting for 4 years (Cobos) and an Economy Minister who asserts that he wants the end of Kirshnerismo (Lousteau). All of them former oficial officers.
http://www.perfil.com/mobile/?nota=/contenidos/2010/01/08/noticia_0018.html
http://edant.clarin.com/diario/2008/07/17/um/m-01717007.htm
http://www.infobae.com/2015/07/21/1743279-martin-lousteau-quiero-que-ser-termine-el-kirchnerismo-quiero-alternancia
She cannot do worst.