Well, this is a good question.
As I mentioned before, it is a matter of International Public christian Law that was born at the Westfalia capitulation / peace and with the books of grocio and Vattel.
The first principle is that States are equal because the Medieval Ages was based in relationship of serfdom between States and between the State and its populations who were subjects and became citizens. The French, American and Argentine Revolution that liberated Chile and Peru was a consequence of it. This is why Argentina abolished slavery as early as 1813.
The second principle is that the relationships are based on the Christian peace. This means that the State cannot make a jihad against its population, foreigners or not. This is why the members of the last military coup were judged, sentenced and died in Jail but not only the leaders, even the privates,
So, while the DNU 70/2017 treats the ilegal entry as an act of war, the valid International UN Treaty against trafficking says they are victims of trafficking who deserves protection including a DNI and housing because Deuteronomy says do not give back to his master the slave who escapes to you.
The Universal Declaration of Human Right was born as a reaction to the III Reich that was an islamic State. The Interamerican Convention About Human Rights, the same but European and its International Courts enforces it.
The Treaty of Rome that creates the International Crimes against Humanity are all based in avoiding an Islamic State, the same the International Criminal Court that enforces it. The crimes against the humanity I remember now because I work about them are: 1) Genocide, 2) Slavery and 3) Apartheid. The 3 of them have its source in the Holy Book of the Mohammedans.
The problem about immigration is that Christians were the slaves of muslims. An slavery different from the plantations of the Us based of greed; it was an slavery based on sexual abuse of children: boys and girls and this is why the Wesfalia Peace was alike the allied against the III Reich. This is why Hitler used to say that the Reich was going to last 1000 years.
In those days like today, to study its law was a taboo and a crime in many countries and it was a mistake because it allowed it to resurrect.
Look what Oppenheim says about it:
View attachment 6160
