scarface said:
Do you sense the comical irony of your hypocritical comment? The greedy lawyer? Classic sterotype.
Bajo_Cero2 has donated his expertise to this thread despite the personal attacks on him by stupid and uninformed jerks who insist on advocating unethical and untenable postions. Expats should thank him. .
Thank you for appreciating my irony. I dont know who the uninformed jerks are, I myself expressed an opinion, this was challenged and I have defended my position, I declared my knowledge of Argentine law from the outset, and this led led to stupid comments from Bajo_Cero2.
scarface said:
Landlords and RE agents who rent out temp apts as an ongoing business should know the basic laws affecting their business. Even if they don't have actual knowledge of the law, the law will nevertheless presume that they do. And it is absolutely correct to do so. On the other hand, tenants who rent out an apt in a foreign country are not expected to know the law. Get it?.
What you are saying is ridiculous, if a person signs a contract then they are by virtue of the fact that they are signing that contract conrirming that they uderstand the contact and agree to its terms. I myslef have signed contracts in Spanish which I didnt understand, but I was aware it was a risk. Ignorance if the law is no defence.
scarface said:
LOL. Your arguments are so damn weak and nonsensical that you have resorted to this. OK, it's speculation. We all know that all landlords who work on a cash basis pay all their taxes. There's a bridge I want to show you. (It's only $1000, but if you pay cash you can have it for 900.)..
You and Bajo_Cero2 seem to be keen on quoting the law yet you are happy to post speculative comments about the honesty of persons you dont even know, if you cannot produce links to third party evidence then your speculation is completely rubbished. This kind of speculation wouldnt be allowed in a court of law so why should it be acceptable on an internet forum. I have not doubt that many landlords do not pay their taxes, but also I am in no doubt that there are many who do. This is a total red herring in the peso / dollar discussion, tax can just as easily be avoided if recieving pesos or dollars.
scarface said:
What's a bad law? Requring lease contracts to be paid in AR pesos? Not sure why...as someone else has said (ad nauseum) all the landlord has to do to avoid any hardship is raise the peso price. PROBLEM SOLVED? The law has many benefits and no downside except for those who immorally seek to avoid payment of tax..
This is a bad law because it interferes in agreements between indivuals which should be private. If a landlord offers a property at a particular price and a specified currency, the prospective tenant is at liberty to accept the offer or look elsewhere. If the general public dont have dollars the landlord will be forced, by market forces to change his position. The market should be deciding. The state shouldnt be interfering in the market, at best its what we call in the UK , the nanny state, at worst is repressive. People are adults, let them make their own minds up.
And as you stated, landlords can always to push up the price to compensate. So how is a 20% hike in prices helping the consumer ? Its just another ratchet in the inflationary cycle. In my view dollar pricing has helped keep the market more stable. And whereas I have no knowledge of Argentine law I have 25 years experience at a senior level in Housing Finance.
Throughout these discussions you have not grasped the reason why landlords prefer to take dollars instead of pesos.
Its nothing to do with greed.
These people want dollars because they have no faith in the Argentine currency, its banks or the economy. They would rather save dollars under the mattress than put their money into a peso bank account.
The Government should be fostering confidence in the economy and in the currency, only then will people willingly want to accept it.