SlowWalker
Registered
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2025
- Messages
- 317
- Likes
- 253
Regardless, the idea that the Estado feels the need to "limit" competition between a Ford vehicle manufactured in Michigan at averages factory wages of $20-26 an hour with a Fiat made in Argentina at average wages of maybe $10 an hour (2.4M monthly) shouldn't be a concern. The clear economical advantage should be obvious to buyers when deciding between the two models, unless of course the domestic manufactured cars are so bloated with domestic taxes that they somehow cost the same, which is exactly what some buyers are complaining about.
There is a condition in CUSMA that the labour content of 40-45% for passenger vehicles and 45% for trucks must be performed in a high labour cost country (Canada/US) where the wage is $16/h or higher. So although the competition isn't on the labour cost portion of the vehicle, the US still enforces particular trade practices and this was prior to Trump's tariffs last year.
Additionally, the automobile manufacturers are given huge tax subsidies and benefits by the government when they select locations for new plants and decide to upgrade existing plants.
The general volumes produced in Argentina are much lower than the amounts produced in Canada/US and therefore fixed price portions and additional documentation and bureaucracy and higher taxation will also increase prices.