nicoenarg said:
Ah, now it makes more sense. The party is to celebrate April 27th, 2003 when Menem pulled out of the elections leaving Nestor as the victor.
It just didn't make sense to me that CFK was doing something completely selfless. Its funny how some of the people here perceive it as.
She's throwing a party to celebrate the victory of her husband and people here think she's doing it for them.
This is what I am talking about Matt, willful blindness is what I think it is.
Wow, that's pretty disgusting but I still believe the people involved don't care about Cristis honest feelings but about their own practical daily lives. I also believe they don't calculate that relationship consciously.
My nihilistic point yesterday was that being master of ceremonies of that show that is Democracy in a Cold-Banana Republic ought to be a difficult job - akin to that of a Medieval Prince or a Modern African Democratic Political Party (like the ANC). The figure of this particular president is however a bit unsettling given Evita's precedent and double-crossing everyone by being a secular leftist and named she-Christ at the same time. I know that my redeemer liveth. She's got a good advantage.
Today I still point out that this adm is not going to turn this country "left" to Chavez-Iran but just steer it a bit to keep course: geopolitical absolute neutrality (which is what incidentally raises the value of real estate in this country on the
long term - and what kept certain people safe h last World War)
I believe that's how the Vatican and Brazil handle diplomacy too, neutral during conflicts so they can claim they've been on the victor's side all along - while keeping ties to the loser anyways..
And btw, Their followers know they are being fooled, they just play the part.
It's human nature. When a society that has not crafted a Republic, much less a Democratic Republic, but imposed it by law (ultimately of the strongest); then the people don't automatically become bearers of sovereignty but accommodate and re-name serfdom-> citizenship or party-loyalty. That's what I mean by self-sovereignty and that's why maybe Switzerland is the closest example I know of.
I suspect the case in Argentina is similar to another thriving Democracy.
In South Africa the people who vote for the ANC know the politicians wont "keep their promises", but still prefer the populist party for being populist, because, according to one interviewd, "it shows us that they love us" (that the prince will be a kind ruler).
It should be noted that in the Western Cape people do not vote for the ANC - much like in Uruguay Peronism would be inconceivable.
The stickers-on-paid publicity are the norm- in all of Latam, and no administration would be ashamed of it even it considered it a potential issue. Cultural differences, like the President of France can get away with certain things that the President of the USA would be impeached for.
@Gringoboy, see, that's why I don't watch tv and carefully select my youtube programming ... for instance yesterday great 30 rock LIVE! episode had a great time, I don't know what they were talking about in 278.