steveinbsas
Registered
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2006
- Messages
- 10,505
- Likes
- 6,675
.It was enlightening to read collectivist-in-chief Mitt Romney's comments on the Sochi olympics. Based on his experience frittering away some $600 million in public funds on the 2002 games, Mitt the Collectivist said,
"You don't need to spend $50 billion, as Russia has, or as China did, to put on Olympic sport. Olympic sport can be demonstrated at $2 [billion] or $3 billion," Romney said. "And all that extra money could be used to do some very important things, in terms of fighting poverty and fighting disease around the world. That's what we really ought to be using those resources for, as opposed to wasting them, in many cases, to show off a country or, I think more cynically, to show off the politicians in a country.
Freakin' Leninist.
Romney is indeed a collectivist.
That's why he was the Left's first choice to be the Republican candidate for President of The United States in 2102.
What's really disgusting (to me) is that he doesn't sound like he knows where "all that extra money" comes from or how it could create jobs and reduce (not just fight) poverty if it wasn't squandered by politicians, supposedly doing "some very important things" which actually waste a great deal of "that" money and are now driving more individuals and families in the United States into poverty.