Stafford said:
I suppose the SUBE card may force honesty in the system as there would be a solid paper trail.
The SUBE card was purposely implemented for this reason. I'm sure many of us have taken the subway free at night because the boleteria no longer wants to sell us a ticket. There's no incentive for them to make money because they know at the end of the day that they can lie about the quantity of the passengers and get their money anyway. Why won't
Clarin report this fact?
The government knows that millions and millions of pesos are robbed every year. From
Pagina 12:
"En la actualidad los subsidios al transporte, que superan los
12 mil millones de pesos anuales, se orientan a las empresas.
La liquidación se realiza por declaración jurada. Es decir que el Estado paga lo que la empresa reclama. Los colectivos reciben un subsidio que representa el 70 por ciento de sus ingresos; porcentaje igual recibe el subte. En el caso del ferrocarril el subsidio significa el 80 por ciento de sus ingresos. En diversos controles se han encontrado pedidos de subsidio por viajes no realizados o por más pasajeros de los que viajaron. El transporte más difícil de controlar es el de colectivos, que además es el que más fondos recibe por subsidios: 7500 millones de pesos al año. La Secretaría de Transporte ha detectado una cantidad importante de viajes de noche que no se realizan, pero las empresas igual reclaman el subsidio.
La estimación oficial es que el nuevo sistema ahorrará aproximadamente 2000 millones de pesos anuales por mayor transparencia."
So, $2.8 billion USD are spent per year on subsidizing public transport. (I believe this number includes all forms of transport, including national flights for Argentine residents.) Metrovias and the various bus lines receive those funds through a sworn declaration -- in other words, the government says, "We'll take your word for it." With SUBE, the government expects to save $469 million USD, which would otherwise have been stolen by the Subway lines and colectivos. That's a lot of dough.
I can't agree more with the government that they should be in the business of
subsidizing those who need the subsidy and not the companies. The only problem with this is how do you determine who deserves the subsidy and who doesn't? I don't think the answer is as clear as we'd like to think it is.