They ask exactly " todos los comprobantes" .
1)If I bring certificate from an accountant (which is accepted by the chamber) but in this case I don`t comply with what exactly I was asked for initially.
2) If I bring what they ask for ' los comprobantes' that I understand are receipts will they deny those proofs as the chamber doesn't accept it?
Although you no longer have most of the the receipts that you were given when you picked up the money in person, if you print out the details of the
COMPLETED transactions from the Western Union website, you will actually be printing "los comprobantes" of your transfers.
Whether or not the court accepts them remains to be seen, They probably know the difference between the website receipt ad the receipts that are provided when you ppick upthe funds in person.
If they then ask for the signed receipts, all you can do is tell the truth.
If I was applying for citizenship now, the only comprobantes I could provide would be printouts (or pdfs) with the transfer details from the Wetern Union website...as well as the email confirmations that were sent when I initiated the transfers.
Because the funds were deposited in my Argentine bank account, I could show evidence of the deposits by alos providing my bank statements, but I would rather not put those statements in the hands of anyone other than a contador publico who could certify the deposits.
I was surprised that any court would not ask for the official certification in the first place. If I understand correctly, is a legal requirement. The court may be "trying to bring you to the path of least resistance," as Lunar surmised, but, as Bajo_Cero2 wrote:
If you do not provide the AC you cannot win an appeal, if you provide the WU tickets, there are precedents against them at the Chamber of Appelas. You full fit it or you should hire a lawyer.
I take this to mean that, if for some reason your "sentence" is negative, that failure to provide the certification by a contador publico, you
cannot win an appeal of the sentence and you would not become an Argentine citizen.
As I previously indicated, if the court insists that you provide WU receipts that you receive when you pick up the cash in person in Argentina, you would probably have to make additonal transfers in order to supply them.
Even if the court will only accept the comprobantes that are provided when you pick up funds in person, I would at least ask them if they would accept the certification by a contador publico who would be able to examine your bank statements and then be able to certify that the funds were sent from the same bank account shown in the WU email confirmations and the WU website receipts/comprobantes (showing matching account numbers, dates and amounts).
Baed on what Bajo_Cero2 wrote, I got the impression that the certification of the contador publico is accepted (by all of the courts) without question and is absolutely necessary in case of an appeal.
Even if the court is willing to cut you some slack and says they will accept the WU confirmation emails and the WU website comprobantes, If I was in the same situtation I would not hesitate to get the certification by the accountant, especially if the source of my income was something I also had to "demonstrate" to the court's satisfaction.
Perhaps this is what Lunar was thinking about when using the expression "opening a can of worms" in post 155. Someone who is living and working in Argentina and being paid by foreign clients, but not declaring, pesifying, or paying taxes on that income might have something to worry about, but I am not certain.
Bajo_Cero2 has previousy posted that you have to "demonstrate an honest means of living" to the court. If I remember correctly, he also indicated that working in blanco was not a requirement, though obvious tax evasion might not go over so well at the courts.
