Clinton - Trump Live Debate Monday Sept. 26 Th.

So you just made it up? I've done some searching and her position doesn't seem to have changed, I've not found any that mention the USA or NATO going in alone.
As for refugee's the vast majority are coming from Syria, Iraq, Eritrea and Afghanistan. I think we can blame Bush and Blair for a large number of those.

No, you seem to make stuff up to defend the position of your candidate, it seems. On a previous link I posted she clearly states that the no-fly zone would be a way to gain leverage over Russia, and that she sees it being imposed by a "coalition", a term that she used many times before when referring to NATO, like she did back when a no-fly zone was imposed over Libya with the goal was to overthrow Qaddafi. There is even a video when the anchor point blank asks her if she would order the US forces to shoot down a Russian jet going over the theoretical no-fly zone (which she deflects). But you seem to ignore those when it is inconvenient to the image you like to sell of Hillary being a "middle of the road center-left politician".
We can blame Bush and Blair (another middle of the road center left-politician) on a lot of shit and a lot of refugees, least we forget that Senator Clinton voted YES for the Bush invasion Iraq. But more specifically, the Libyan civil war and the waves of refugees coming from there are owned by Hillary. And the idea to arm the "moderate" Syrian rebels and dramatically escalate the Syrian civil war was hers too.
 
Bill Clinton is NOT running for president. Hillary has worked for women and children her entire adult life.
Nancy

What about threatening the women who Bill Clinton raped? I just can't believe that these are all untrue. These women have been talking about this for years, not now suddenly before elections. And furthermore, why on earth does she remain with Bill Clinton after he has done all this horrendous stuff, if she cares so much about women? We're talking about a character who has blatantly slept with many, many women, treated them like sexual objects, and allegedly raped several others. Why does she continue on in a charade of a marriage? Perhaps she believes in open marriage like Tim Kaine?

I can understand you might agree with many of her political positions, but I'm stunned that anyone would put trust in Secretary Clinton's character, especially after all the recent Wikileaks, the 33,000 deleted emails, and a host of other questionable things with the Clinton foundation. I'm one of those old fashioned people who think leaders should have great character, and the Clintons don't seem to live up to that whatsoever. If your politics lean left, Jill Stein is a consistent person who actually has some moral fiber and a shred of decency. I can't say the same for either one of them.
 
What about threatening the women who Bill Clinton raped? I just can't believe that these are all untrue. These women have been talking about this for years, not now suddenly before elections. And furthermore, why on earth does she remain with Bill Clinton after he has done all this horrendous stuff, if she cares so much about women? We're talking about a character who has blatantly slept with many, many women, treated them like sexual objects, and allegedly raped several others. Why does she continue on in a charade of a marriage? Perhaps she believes in open marriage like Tim Kaine?

I can understand you might agree with many of her political positions, but I'm stunned that anyone would put trust in Secretary Clinton's character, especially after all the recent Wikileaks, the 33,000 deleted emails, and a host of other questionable things with the Clinton foundation. I'm one of those old fashioned people who think leaders should have great character, and the Clintons don't seem to live up to that whatsoever. If your politics lean left, Jill Stein is a consistent person who actually has some moral fiber and a shred of decency. I can't say the same for either one of them.

Ummm character? Seriously, character?Ignoring all the bs smears against clinton.... Just look at the other guy! Trump is a clinical narcissist! This is the guy that even Marco Rubio said couldn't be trusted with nuclear weapons. Trump cheated on his wife and bragged about it in the tabloids.
 
What about threatening the women who Bill Clinton raped? I just can't believe that these are all untrue. These women have been talking about this for years, not now suddenly before elections. And furthermore, why on earth does she remain with Bill Clinton after he has done all this horrendous stuff, if she cares so much about women? We're talking about a character who has blatantly slept with many, many women, treated them like sexual objects, and allegedly raped several others. Why does she continue on in a charade of a marriage? Perhaps she believes in open marriage like Tim Kaine?

I can understand you might agree with many of her political positions, but I'm stunned that anyone would put trust in Secretary Clinton's character, especially after all the recent Wikileaks, the 33,000 deleted emails, and a host of other questionable things with the Clinton foundation. I'm one of those old fashioned people who think leaders should have great character, and the Clintons don't seem to live up to that whatsoever. If your politics lean left, Jill Stein is a consistent person who actually has some moral fiber and a shred of decency. I can't say the same for either one of them.
"ALLEGEDLY"

And Bill Clinton is NOT running for president.
 
Just look at the other guy! Trump is a clinical narcissist! This is the guy that even Marco Rubio said couldn't be trusted with nuclear weapons. Trump cheated on his wife and bragged about it in the tabloids.


RxEYoa8.png
 
Perhaps you have no idea how women were treated in the 50's 60's 70's 80's 90's and NOW?
N

Since the post i quoted referred specifically to Presidents of the United States as well as the subject of "treating women like garbage" and you only mentioned the 1950’s in that post, I immediately thought of the Presidents Truman and Eisenhower. I never heard anything about either of them treating their wives (or any other women) like garbage. The Presidents who have “treated women like garbage” (in this context, something to be used and discarded) since the 1950’s were JFK, LBJ, and WJBC.

Perhaps I’m not aware how women were treated in the 50’s or 60’s, etc? Well, I was conceived in 1949 and born in 1950. My parents were both 36 at the time. I have one brother who is fourteen months older than I. He has been married to the same woman since 1971. I am sure he has never treated her like garbage and I am even more certain my father never treated my mother like garbage. He never raised his hand to her, and he never raised his voice to her, either. He didn’t have to. He was not a timid man and she was not a timid woman. Their common values made it unnecessary. Both of my parents were strong supporters of FDR, JFK, LBJ, Jimmy Carter, and WJBC.

My mom was a “stay at home” mother. Does this mean she was treated like garbage? She certainly never thought so. My mother could have worked if she had wanted to. She was a certified teacher (University of Northern Iowa). She met my dad in the early 1940’s when he was the principal of the high school in Clarion, Iowa and she was a teacher. After my brother and I were born, our mother never again worked full time. She occasionally did some substitute teaching after my brother and I were in school full time, but she never needed or wanted a career of her own. She didn't believe that a "woman's place is in the home" but believed that her place was in her home. Nonetheless, she was very active in the community, especially in the fight against pornography.

I have previously said that I don’t like Trump, but my dislike for him has nothing to do with his "ALLEGED" behavior or recorded sexist comments (including bragging about cheating). If he becomes President I seriously doubt he will do anything like JFK, LBJ, or WJBC (have sex with "other" women) while in office, especially in the Oval Office. Of much greater concern is the future of all women, as well as all and men and children in the United States. I am referring to the possibility of a war with Russia that could literally (and quickly) go nuclear.

Unless something horrific happens in the next three weeks, either Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton will become the next President of the United States. One of them has expressed a desire to get along with Russia. The other has threatened (if not promised) a military response against with Russia if that country perpetrates a cyber attack. That’s amazing talk coming from someone who used an insecure server while holding the office of Secretary of State. She has even said that if she is elected President that she will attack Iran.

Many Americans are unaware of this because it has not been reported in the "mainstream" media, but there is no doubt that these are things she has said:

https://www.youtube....h?v=w4mkMZhdcBA
 
Ummm character? Seriously, character?Ignoring all the bs smears against clinton.... Just look at the other guy! Trump is a clinical narcissist! This is the guy that even Marco Rubio said couldn't be trusted with nuclear weapons. Trump cheated on his wife and bragged about it in the tabloids.

You clearly did not read my above post. The original post was about the Clintons. My point was that neither Trump nor Clinton are really any better off than the other as far as their behavior goes. I'm not a Trump supporter.
 
Many Americans are unaware of this because it has not been reported in the "mainstream" media, but there is no doubt that these are things she has said:

https://www.youtube....h?v=w4mkMZhdcBA

They are aware of it, but they ignore it or they mentally wall it off.. Just like Trump supporters ignore and wall off the racist or absurd comments their candidate makes. People like to live in the illusion that out there somewhere, there is a loving politician looking out for them and their best interests. And when presented with the evidence that such reality does not exist, they simply refuse to accept it, as they find it too painful and scary that there is no all powerful political being out there protecting them, so they ignore the evidence and cling to the fantasy. Politics has in many ways replaced religion. Our messiah, prophets and demons became political figures.
 
Back
Top