It's a reflection of the justice system in this country that all the case appears to be about is what each one of us believes about CFK.
If there's a smoking gun, why don't her opponents cite it, instead of trying to wish "pruebas contundentes" into existence? Absolutely nobody is talking about the evidence, a situation which should speak for itself.
Actually, there is evidence, and it was available three years ago, when Macri was still president. A team of the relevant experts went to Santz Cruz and carried out a full audit. They found that discrepancies between what work was contracted and what was delivered was less than 2%, well within the usual limits for the rest of Argentina.
Santa Cruz is the southernmost mainland province of Argentina. Construction costs are higher for a variety of reasons, including weather and the distance from the rest of the country. Yes, a local construction firm was awarded a majority of the contracts, but that's because they consistently outbid the others. They were able to do this because they have the equipment already in Santa Cruz, as opposed to having to truck or rail it in, as construction firms from the north would have done. Their costs were lower, so their bids were lower.
You never heard any of this because the media other than Pagina12 and C5N are all firmly Macrista, being part of the Clarin empire, which was owned by the now-deceased Herrera de Noble, and enlarged by shady means during the last dictatorship. See the Papel Prensa case for the most glaring example.
I don't expect anyone to be convinced by what I have written here. We live in the age of information warfare, and Operation Condor 2 is being carried out via Lawfare and the Soft Coup, rather than the military coups used last time (Chile 74, Argentina 76, et al). You have to look hard to see through the smoke and mirrors, but the information is out there. I am firmly convinced that all the cases against Cristina are "armado", we would say "trumped up" in English, (with a small T, having nothing to do with The Donald). And they have succeeded admirably, because people assume that where there's smoke, there's fire. I mean, she's accused of all these things, she must be guilty of something, right?