Gringoboy
Registered
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2009
- Messages
- 4,624
- Likes
- 4,689
Someone I know who's a biker, was recently stopped by the police in Mar del Plata for not wearing a helmet and reflective jacket marked with his registration number.
He was issued with a ticket and his licence taken away on the spot, but just managed to not have his bike taken as the police didn't have any more room in the vehicle compound.
The following day he went to court that issues the fines, only to discover that his fine would be $3582, which could be reduced to half that, if he paid there and then, which he couldn't do.
They offered him a payment plan, which meant he could only get his license back after the third payment. It also transpires that the law regarding helmets and jackets was only published publicly after his alleged offence took place, at least a week in fact.
Fortunately his wife is a lawyer and they both set to work to quash this lunacy right away.
They soon discovered that law number 532/09 clearly states that the fine should be between 50 and 100 fiscal units (1ltr petrol), whereas they had applied some arbitrary number out of the air I.E.300 UF (unidades fiscales).
His first appeal a week later, resulted in a reduction down to 150 UF ($895 after discount) and the return of his driving licence.
He appealed again and the fine was reduced down to 75 UF.
He appealed a third time and the fine was further reduced to 25 UF ($298.5), citing a litre of petrol May/June at $11.94 per unit, which then ended his saga.
I've read this law and it quite clearly states the fine to be between 50 and 100 fiscal units, which is a long, long way from $3582 and is a salutary lesson for all of us I think.
It's also worth noting that his wife was riding as a passenger and it is she who should have been wearing the marked reflective jacket.
However, the law is very murky as to the issue of a solo rider and tends to rely a great deal on interpretation of said law.
He was issued with a ticket and his licence taken away on the spot, but just managed to not have his bike taken as the police didn't have any more room in the vehicle compound.
The following day he went to court that issues the fines, only to discover that his fine would be $3582, which could be reduced to half that, if he paid there and then, which he couldn't do.
They offered him a payment plan, which meant he could only get his license back after the third payment. It also transpires that the law regarding helmets and jackets was only published publicly after his alleged offence took place, at least a week in fact.
Fortunately his wife is a lawyer and they both set to work to quash this lunacy right away.
They soon discovered that law number 532/09 clearly states that the fine should be between 50 and 100 fiscal units (1ltr petrol), whereas they had applied some arbitrary number out of the air I.E.300 UF (unidades fiscales).
His first appeal a week later, resulted in a reduction down to 150 UF ($895 after discount) and the return of his driving licence.
He appealed again and the fine was reduced down to 75 UF.
He appealed a third time and the fine was further reduced to 25 UF ($298.5), citing a litre of petrol May/June at $11.94 per unit, which then ended his saga.
I've read this law and it quite clearly states the fine to be between 50 and 100 fiscal units, which is a long, long way from $3582 and is a salutary lesson for all of us I think.
It's also worth noting that his wife was riding as a passenger and it is she who should have been wearing the marked reflective jacket.
However, the law is very murky as to the issue of a solo rider and tends to rely a great deal on interpretation of said law.