FrankPintor
Registered
- Joined
- May 14, 2019
- Messages
- 2,493
- Likes
- 2,528
10) In all fairness, it looks like since in H1-2022 it ranged from 3 to 7.5% monthly. So from mid 2020 the curve indicates a trend up. Did the government do anything to alter course or not? I understand this is also during the pandemic but from my understanding he didn't do a great job handling that either (I was not here then nor have I studied much about it).
Yes Milei has the high 2023 number due to devaluation and that also would have carried through for a few months following as it rippled through the system and other impacts (salary and rent adjustments). That devaluation was also necessary as it was just the government propping up the peso artificially. Hence the extre difference between the official and Blue dollars at the time, which have essentially not existed since.
10) who are you being fair to? I'd suggest the variations between the start of Alberto's term and 2022 are not statistically significant. No upward trend.
Where do you get that Alberto didn't do a great job of handling the pandemic? I think he did as well as possible, given the circumstances and given the scientific knowledge at the time. Remember, there was no lockdown, we could always go out. As far as possible, we moved to remote work. It wasn't ideal, but the numbers show that Argentina performed well in an international comparison. Libertarians and antivaxxers would have you believe otherwise, of course (and a new one just outed himself recently). Alberto's problem was the handling of the economy, particularly post-COVID.
Differences have opened up again between the blue and official Dollar rates since Milei assumed the presidency. I can't find a graph comparing both rates right now, but fairly recently (around election time?), a 10-20% gap opened up, which is not insignificant. Also, typically, the blue Dollar has a wider spread The gap is small now, but the spread for the blue Dollar is normally around 20 Pesos, while the spread for the official rate might be 50 Pesos or more, indicating (I think) less confidence in the official rate. In short, the difference is there and it can become quite large, even now.
11) I have a hard time reading you when you go off at a tangent. I thought you were asking how the INDEC monthly inflation index has been manipulated, and I demonstrated fairly conclusively how this has been done. End of, I thought, but now you want to talk about cash, digital wallets, and the like. Not going there, sorry.11) I will say that I have a hard time reading some translated articles here. I think its due to the slang here, but also the style of writing. In that article it mentions that they use what you will pay in cash versus by other means. Considering many people digital wallets (MP and MODO) and they get discounts with those. I think it also said something about that if there was a 10% discount this period then that would apply to the previous period. I didn't really understand this point. The way they price things here I think does alter the comparative unit pricing used for the measurements. In which case, Caputo is correct. To suggest using the unit price when in reality people buy it according to the discounts (or why would they be offered) would be ignoring reality. In terms of delaying the implementation of a new basket composition, there are a couple issues from my understanding:a) comparing monthly inflation numbers with differing composition criteria making comparison with previous months impossible, and b) the recomposition was based on a survey from 2018 (prepandemic etc) and that this new comosition isn't current anymore in terms of being representative. Therefore, the update would not really be closing the gap as well as it can be in terms of representativeness. If people want to suggest that the current numbers are not realistic, then wouldn't that also carry back to the previous administration numbers including the ones you have presented?
I think without a doubt the inflation numbers reported in Argentina are extremely more accurate and functional than those reported in other countries, primarily North America.
Caputo is most certainly not correct. While one primary objective for an inflation index is to be able to compare past and current inflation numbers, and in the case where continuity should be sacrificed (perhaps changed consumer behaviour, or whatever), make the transition to a new methodology as clear and as transparent as possible. Or if the decision is not to change, then also make this as clear and as transparent as possible. Not force the resignation of the head of the agency, but then, nothing Caputo does is either clear or transparent. Why are you asking about previous administrations? Whataboutism doesn't win arguments.
I think without a doubt you've drawn the opposite conclusion to most observers of Argentina's economy. Certainly the opposite conclusion to most of the forum members. But maybe, against all evidence, you've made your mind up already. That's fine, we can stop now.
Last edited: