If You Had Your Druthers, How Do You Fix Argentina?

Phil,

I don't have enough info to have an opinion on the online registration system, but check this article out on the same story:

http://www.ambito.co...a.asp?id=710864



This in both cases is a prime example of crappy journalism. You have two stories on the same topic that give diametrically opposite details, and why? look at the sources each of them talked to. La Nación only talked to the administration and Ámbito only talked to the unions/parents. Why can't you get a news article where the reporter talks to both sides? Yet both read as "news" stories, (not opinion) and leave the reader thinking he got some sort of objective look at the issue. Garbage.

Look, my girlfriend's son is starting the colegio next year so I do have a little first hand knowledge. Kids are put first and formost with the siblings, and with just a tad less priority in schools in which their siblings had graduated. The part about getting notified at the end of the year is true because they spend time placing students making sure that kids aren't separated and that as many get their first choice as they can.

The problem is that some schools in the city are much much more popular than others and are over enrolled where as others are under enrolled. Previously you had a bunch of people try to get their kids in the popular schools and then they weren't notified till mid november to december if they had gotten in, which then caused all the parents to have to run around looking for other schools all over the city.

Having the whole process computerized makes more since and is a lot more convenient for kids whose parents both work. I suppose that upper class families that have one wage earner and another stay at home parent who can wait in line to register their child during a work day have the luxury of complaining about diminishing parent - school contact, but if it bothers them that much, they can afford to pay a private school.

This is like saying that digital switching destroyed the personal contact with your local telephone operator.
 
Well, many of those ideas were done by Cavallo, look how it finished:
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uYFXcx153ro
 
Well, many of those ideas were done by Cavallo, look how it finished:
http://m.youtube.com...h?v=uYFXcx153ro

True, but give notebookfix credit for consistency. Everyone here squawks about inflation, but he is the only one who proposed a solution that would actually bring inflation down: cutting what is by far the largest part of the budget, namely social expenditures. And not only did he just generally say cut spending; no, he specified cutting social programmes and the asignación universal por hijo.

Of course as Bajo correctly points out, this is exactly the plan implemented by Cavallo (on repeated occasions) that led to unemployment rates in the 25% range and the subsequent financial crisis.

As evil as his suggestions are, at least give notebookfix credit for being consistent.
 
As evil as his suggestions are, at least give notebookfix credit for being consistent.

B. I'd cut the wasteful 'choripan' government public expenditure...(1billion pesos and counting)...

What's so evil about cutting "wasteful" spending? Someone enlighten me.

And I never knew Cavallo "tried all that": He put the K's on trial for treason. Sent people blocking the roads to prison. Sent thieves to prison...didn't he have something to do with the economy?
 
Bight the bullet and settle with creditors to access cheap foreign $$$$/investment/loans.
And the hits keep coming:

http://www.lapoliticaonline.com/noticias/val/95037-7/exclusivo-se-cayo-el-financiamiento-para-las-represas-de-santa-cruz-.html

http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A//www.lapoliticaonline.com/noticias/val/95037-7/exclusivo-se-cayo-el-financiamiento-para-las-represas-de-santa-cruz-.html&hl=en&langpair=auto|en&tbb=1&ie=ISO-8859-1
 

Was your last post a reply to mine? Because it still doesn't answer my question. He would reorganize subsidios...again, even with that...what is so evil about it?
 
OK I read his saying he wouldn't cut ALL of the subsidies off as saying he would cut some of them, which i think is a reasonable interpretation.

That is what is being done now in Europe: austerity, sucking money out of the demand side of the economy to keep inflation down. This inevitably has huge human consequences such as we saw in the 90s here and which we are seeing in places like Greece, Portugal, Spain now. The clear irrefutable result would be higher unemployment and increased poverty. But hey inflation is 0.4% in Spain!
 
That is what is being done now in Europe: austerity, sucking money out of the demand side of the economy to keep inflation down. This inevitably has huge human consequences such as we saw in the 90s here and which we are seeing in places like Greece, Portugal, Spain now. The clear irrefutable result would be higher unemployment and increased poverty. But hey inflation is 0.4% in Spain!

I don't know if you can call a budget deficit equivalent to 6% of the GDP, "austerity". How big does the budget deficit needs to be before it is no longer considered "austere"?
 
OK I read his saying he wouldn't cut ALL of the subsidies off as saying he would cut some of them, which i think is a reasonable interpretation.

That is what is being done now in Europe: austerity, sucking money out of the demand side of the economy to keep inflation down. This inevitably has huge human consequences such as we saw in the 90s here and which we are seeing in places like Greece, Portugal, Spain now. The clear irrefutable result would be higher unemployment and increased poverty. But hey inflation is 0.4% in Spain!


One of the meanings of the inflation is PEOPLE WITH MONEY.

Money to the people.
 
Back
Top