John.St said:I totally agree - that's why I need 500 years.
Things have been really bad 7 or 8 times during the last 75 years and that hasn't changed anything.
To be honest I have a hope that the very young, who now have friends all over the world through the internet, and thus receive much better information of how things are elsewhere, will revolutionize Argentina in 20-30 years when they are in power - but the old tracks warn against optimism.
I agree. At the the peak of the crisis, when it was physically dangerous to be a politician (there were assaults on politicians in public places; one politician in Junin had their home burned down) an Argentine lawyer friend observed that this was the moment for change, that the Argentine people had the opportunity to throw out the corrupt politicians - by voting for any party (socialist, Communist - anything) but the one in power. The people could show disgust with the system and force change. At the time he said that he was hopeful but he added that, based on history, he doubted that the people would seize the moment. They didn't, needless to say.
As for Perry's comments: I agree that the educational and cultural level in Argentina is much higher than Brazil's. I am not sure that I can say that it is higher than Chile's, though. Brazil is a country with an enormous poor population. I don't see how they can ever deal with problem of an exploding population. By contrast, Argentina has far fewer people and a more manageable situation. Sadly, Argentina hasn't done well in dealing with its poverty. A country as rich in natural resources has no excuse for serious poverty or poor education. The huge influx of mostly uneducated people from countries in the region is not helping. My fear is that the underclass will continue to grow, the middle class will keep shrinking and Argentina will look more like the poorer countries in the region. That seems to be happening now as some grow richer and richer and many others sink.