"bigbadwolf" said:
"Crash" and "collapse" are words designed to provoke hysteria.
I don't know the etymology of those words, but for me they are used to describe a situation. 'Shit, my computer crashed' or 'Shit, my back has collapsed'
bigbadWolf said:
Collapse can be used to describe what happened to the German mark in the Weimar Republic or the post-WW2 Hungarian pengo. But it is exceedingly unlikely to occur to the world hegemon.
Why? Rome fell... I know the FED is trying do anything to keep the lifeblod, credit, flowing, but it don't work.
bigbadWolf said:
There are also some mistakes in the video: the dollar didn't start declining from 1999; it was probably early 2001. The US doesn't need $3bn a day; it's around $2bn.
I don't know when exactly the dollar started to decline. Some one will say that it started when the US got off the gold standard and it depends on what you compare it with. Dollar vs Gold, Dollar vs other currencies, dollar vs oil +++
But the fact is the dollar trend is downward and the money US need every day is upward...
bigbadWolf said:
These mistakes and exaggerations weaken the credibility of an otherwise good line of reasoning. Stephen Roach happens to be one of my favorite economists. And I too have been short the dollar since 1998 (even while the dollar kept appreciating against the euro until one euro could only buy $0.83 in late 2000/early 2001). And I agree that the road to any kind of equilibrium will involve massive convulsions in the US economy and the world economy. Perhaps the current US recession is a harbinger of much greater troubles to follow.
Check out this graph:
http://folk.uio.no/fredrin/super_bubbleb.GIF What happens after infinity? *heart attack*
And a funny video:
John Fortune & John Bird on the South Bank show
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJ_qK4g6ntM
It's funny because it's true, hehe
-s-